Sameness of Fregean sense

Susanna Schellenberg

doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0098-7

Sameness of Fregean sense

Susanna Schellenberg

School of Arts and Sciences, Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper develops a criterion for sameness of Fregean senses. I consider three criteria: logical equivalence, intensional isomorphism, and epistemic equipollence. I reject the first two and argue for a version of the third.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	163-175
Number of pages	13
Journal	Synthese
Volume	189
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0098-7
State	Published - Nov 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Philosophy
Social Sciences(all)

Keywords

Cognitive equivalence
Epistemic equipollence
Identity
Intensional isomorphism
Logical equivalence
Sense

Access to Document

10.1007/s11229-012-0098-7

Cite this

@article{f46a6264fb9c453a97091cce121e433a,

title = "Sameness of Fregean sense",

abstract = "This paper develops a criterion for sameness of Fregean senses. I consider three criteria: logical equivalence, intensional isomorphism, and epistemic equipollence. I reject the first two and argue for a version of the third.",

keywords = "Cognitive equivalence, Epistemic equipollence, Identity, Intensional isomorphism, Logical equivalence, Sense",

author = "Susanna Schellenberg",

year = "2012",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1007/s11229-012-0098-7",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "189",

pages = "163--175",

journal = "Synthese",

issn = "0039-7857",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sameness of Fregean sense

AU - Schellenberg, Susanna

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - This paper develops a criterion for sameness of Fregean senses. I consider three criteria: logical equivalence, intensional isomorphism, and epistemic equipollence. I reject the first two and argue for a version of the third.

AB - This paper develops a criterion for sameness of Fregean senses. I consider three criteria: logical equivalence, intensional isomorphism, and epistemic equipollence. I reject the first two and argue for a version of the third.

KW - Cognitive equivalence

KW - Epistemic equipollence

KW - Identity

KW - Intensional isomorphism

KW - Logical equivalence

KW - Sense

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867745990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867745990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11229-012-0098-7

DO - 10.1007/s11229-012-0098-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867745990

SN - 0039-7857

VL - 189

SP - 163

EP - 175

JO - Synthese

JF - Synthese

IS - 1

ER -

Sameness of Fregean sense

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this