TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific discourse of citizen scientists
T2 - Models as a boundary object for collaborative problem solving
AU - Huang, Joey
AU - Hmelo-Silver, Cindy E.
AU - Jordan, Rebecca
AU - Gray, Steven
AU - Frensley, Troy
AU - Newman, Greg
AU - Stern, Marc J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the Virginia Master Naturalist volunteers, and software developers from Kiff Consulting, Steve Walsh, and Jonathan Elbom. Funding for this study was provided by the National Science Foundation Award 1233722 . Initial funding for Mental Modeler was provided by USDA .
Funding Information:
We would like to thank the Virginia Master Naturalist volunteers, and software developers from Kiff Consulting, Steve Walsh, and Jonathan Elbom. Funding for this study was provided by the National Science Foundation Award 1233722. Initial funding for Mental Modeler was provided by USDA.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - In this study, we examine the nature of scientific discourse among participants enrolled in two citizen science projects as they engage in collaborative modeling and problem solving. Specifically, we explore the nature of their conversation as they use, the Mental Modeler, an online collaborative modeling tool to facilitate science engagement, systems-thinking and reasoning. This paper applies an analytical approach that uses visual representations and the discourse around building these representations to understand the shifts in scientific discourse and interpret complex interaction patterns between participants and facilitators in the computer-based learning environment. Findings suggest that the Mental Modeler serves as a boundary object that empowers participants and facilitators to collaboratively engage with scientific topics and practices through the development of scientific discourse and deeper learning in problem solving contexts. Findings shows patterns for group modeling in terms of shifting from bottom-up level to top-down level of discussions. In addition, the results show greater group collaboration and interaction when participants engage in the discussion by using the Mental Modeler to plan and model the citizen science projects.
AB - In this study, we examine the nature of scientific discourse among participants enrolled in two citizen science projects as they engage in collaborative modeling and problem solving. Specifically, we explore the nature of their conversation as they use, the Mental Modeler, an online collaborative modeling tool to facilitate science engagement, systems-thinking and reasoning. This paper applies an analytical approach that uses visual representations and the discourse around building these representations to understand the shifts in scientific discourse and interpret complex interaction patterns between participants and facilitators in the computer-based learning environment. Findings suggest that the Mental Modeler serves as a boundary object that empowers participants and facilitators to collaboratively engage with scientific topics and practices through the development of scientific discourse and deeper learning in problem solving contexts. Findings shows patterns for group modeling in terms of shifting from bottom-up level to top-down level of discussions. In addition, the results show greater group collaboration and interaction when participants engage in the discussion by using the Mental Modeler to plan and model the citizen science projects.
KW - Citizen science
KW - Collaborative learning
KW - Computer-based learning environments
KW - Engagement
KW - Participatory modeling
KW - Scientific practices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045307904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045307904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045307904
VL - 87
SP - 480
EP - 492
JO - Computers in Human Behavior
JF - Computers in Human Behavior
SN - 0747-5632
ER -