Selection into occupations and the intergenerational mobility of daughters and sons

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper documents how gender differences in occupational status (defined by earnings, education, and returns to skills) have evolved over time and across generations. The paper finds a persistent gender earnings gap, a reversal of the education gap, and a convergence in starting salaries and returns to experience. Divergent occupational choices might explain part of the persistent gender gaps and women's failure to reach parity with men in the earnings distribution. Women choose more flexible jobs than men. But whereas men dominate women in high-powered occupations, they are also more likely to be in low-skilled low-pay occupations. Differential effects of children and time spent keeping house explain most of the gender gap in high-powered occupations but cannot explain fully why women choose more flexible occupations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-306
Number of pages46
JournalResearch in Labor Economics
Volume42
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

intergenerational mobility
occupation
gender
occupational choice
occupational status
salary
gender-specific factors
education
Intergenerational mobility
experience
time
Gender gap
Education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Industrial relations
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{39cd4f069f5a4bccb464aeacc9decac7,
title = "Selection into occupations and the intergenerational mobility of daughters and sons",
abstract = "This paper documents how gender differences in occupational status (defined by earnings, education, and returns to skills) have evolved over time and across generations. The paper finds a persistent gender earnings gap, a reversal of the education gap, and a convergence in starting salaries and returns to experience. Divergent occupational choices might explain part of the persistent gender gaps and women's failure to reach parity with men in the earnings distribution. Women choose more flexible jobs than men. But whereas men dominate women in high-powered occupations, they are also more likely to be in low-skilled low-pay occupations. Differential effects of children and time spent keeping house explain most of the gender gap in high-powered occupations but cannot explain fully why women choose more flexible occupations.",
author = "Julia Schwenkenberg",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S0147-912120150000042008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "261--306",
journal = "Research in Labor Economics",
issn = "0147-9121",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

Selection into occupations and the intergenerational mobility of daughters and sons. / Schwenkenberg, Julia.

In: Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 42, 01.01.2015, p. 261-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection into occupations and the intergenerational mobility of daughters and sons

AU - Schwenkenberg, Julia

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This paper documents how gender differences in occupational status (defined by earnings, education, and returns to skills) have evolved over time and across generations. The paper finds a persistent gender earnings gap, a reversal of the education gap, and a convergence in starting salaries and returns to experience. Divergent occupational choices might explain part of the persistent gender gaps and women's failure to reach parity with men in the earnings distribution. Women choose more flexible jobs than men. But whereas men dominate women in high-powered occupations, they are also more likely to be in low-skilled low-pay occupations. Differential effects of children and time spent keeping house explain most of the gender gap in high-powered occupations but cannot explain fully why women choose more flexible occupations.

AB - This paper documents how gender differences in occupational status (defined by earnings, education, and returns to skills) have evolved over time and across generations. The paper finds a persistent gender earnings gap, a reversal of the education gap, and a convergence in starting salaries and returns to experience. Divergent occupational choices might explain part of the persistent gender gaps and women's failure to reach parity with men in the earnings distribution. Women choose more flexible jobs than men. But whereas men dominate women in high-powered occupations, they are also more likely to be in low-skilled low-pay occupations. Differential effects of children and time spent keeping house explain most of the gender gap in high-powered occupations but cannot explain fully why women choose more flexible occupations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939810770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939810770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S0147-912120150000042008

DO - 10.1108/S0147-912120150000042008

M3 - Review article

VL - 42

SP - 261

EP - 306

JO - Research in Labor Economics

JF - Research in Labor Economics

SN - 0147-9121

ER -