'Sensitivity' and 'specificity' reconsidered: The meaning of these terms in analytical and diagnostic settings

Alfred J. Saah, Donald R. Hoover

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

188 Scopus citations

Abstract

Imprecise usage of the terms 'sensitivity' and 'specificity' produces confusion in the diagnostic use of sophisticated laboratory test results. 'Analytical sensitivity' represents the smallest amount of substance in a sample that can accurately be measured by an assay. 'Analytical specificity' refers to the ability of an assay to measure one particular organism or substance, rather than others, in a sample. An assay's analytical sensitivity and analytical specificity are distinct from that assay's clinical diagnostic sensitivity and diagnostic specificity. 'Diagnostic sensitivity' is the percentage of persons who have a given disorder who are identified by the assay as positive for the disorder. High analytical sensitivity does not guarantee acceptable diagnostic sensitivity. 'Diagnostic specificity' is the percentage of persons who do not have a given condition who are identified by the assay as negative for the condition. False-positive reactions occur because of sample contamination and diminish the diagnostic specificity of the assay. The terms 'sensitivity' and 'specificity' should be used with the requisite adjectives because the 'diagnostic' and the 'analytical' meanings of these terms are very different.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-94
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume126
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of ''Sensitivity' and 'specificity' reconsidered: The meaning of these terms in analytical and diagnostic settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this