Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a ‘riot’

Ian Litton, Jonathan Potter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper critically examines the notion of social representations by way of a systematic analysis of media and participants' accounts of the St Pauls street disturbances of 1980. The analysis concentrates on two major explanatory categories which appear in the accounts: (A) ‘race’; (B) ‘government cuts and amenities’. In each case it is possible to distinguish three different levels of consensus between accounts: (i) particular explanatory schemata can be recognized as available but treated as mistaken; (ii) particular explanatory schemata can be recognized as relevant and adopted to explain the particular events, although in different ways; (iii) particular schemata can be adopted and used to explain events in the same way. The flexible meaning of these categories is highlighted along with the recurrent reference to alternative explanations. These findings raise problems for the suggestion that social representations minimize conflict and create ‘consensual universes’, and question the straightforward relationship between social representations and identifiable social groups. In conclusion the need is identified for a more detailed analysis of the language in which social representations are couched, and the relationship they bear to different contexts of use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-388
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Riots
Social Problems
Consensus
Language
Conflict (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{3b0d66b5404047f09575a806afa2fdf0,
title = "Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a ‘riot’",
abstract = "This paper critically examines the notion of social representations by way of a systematic analysis of media and participants' accounts of the St Pauls street disturbances of 1980. The analysis concentrates on two major explanatory categories which appear in the accounts: (A) ‘race’; (B) ‘government cuts and amenities’. In each case it is possible to distinguish three different levels of consensus between accounts: (i) particular explanatory schemata can be recognized as available but treated as mistaken; (ii) particular explanatory schemata can be recognized as relevant and adopted to explain the particular events, although in different ways; (iii) particular schemata can be adopted and used to explain events in the same way. The flexible meaning of these categories is highlighted along with the recurrent reference to alternative explanations. These findings raise problems for the suggestion that social representations minimize conflict and create ‘consensual universes’, and question the straightforward relationship between social representations and identifiable social groups. In conclusion the need is identified for a more detailed analysis of the language in which social representations are couched, and the relationship they bear to different contexts of use.",
author = "Ian Litton and Jonathan Potter",
year = "1985",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.2420150402",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "371--388",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a ‘riot’. / Litton, Ian; Potter, Jonathan.

In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.01.1985, p. 371-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a ‘riot’

AU - Litton, Ian

AU - Potter, Jonathan

PY - 1985/1/1

Y1 - 1985/1/1

N2 - This paper critically examines the notion of social representations by way of a systematic analysis of media and participants' accounts of the St Pauls street disturbances of 1980. The analysis concentrates on two major explanatory categories which appear in the accounts: (A) ‘race’; (B) ‘government cuts and amenities’. In each case it is possible to distinguish three different levels of consensus between accounts: (i) particular explanatory schemata can be recognized as available but treated as mistaken; (ii) particular explanatory schemata can be recognized as relevant and adopted to explain the particular events, although in different ways; (iii) particular schemata can be adopted and used to explain events in the same way. The flexible meaning of these categories is highlighted along with the recurrent reference to alternative explanations. These findings raise problems for the suggestion that social representations minimize conflict and create ‘consensual universes’, and question the straightforward relationship between social representations and identifiable social groups. In conclusion the need is identified for a more detailed analysis of the language in which social representations are couched, and the relationship they bear to different contexts of use.

AB - This paper critically examines the notion of social representations by way of a systematic analysis of media and participants' accounts of the St Pauls street disturbances of 1980. The analysis concentrates on two major explanatory categories which appear in the accounts: (A) ‘race’; (B) ‘government cuts and amenities’. In each case it is possible to distinguish three different levels of consensus between accounts: (i) particular explanatory schemata can be recognized as available but treated as mistaken; (ii) particular explanatory schemata can be recognized as relevant and adopted to explain the particular events, although in different ways; (iii) particular schemata can be adopted and used to explain events in the same way. The flexible meaning of these categories is highlighted along with the recurrent reference to alternative explanations. These findings raise problems for the suggestion that social representations minimize conflict and create ‘consensual universes’, and question the straightforward relationship between social representations and identifiable social groups. In conclusion the need is identified for a more detailed analysis of the language in which social representations are couched, and the relationship they bear to different contexts of use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985819206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84985819206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2420150402

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2420150402

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84985819206

VL - 15

SP - 371

EP - 388

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 4

ER -