TY - JOUR
T1 - Strata of the state
T2 - Resource nationalism and vertical territory in Bolivia
AU - Marston, Andrea
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation doctoral scholarship, a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada doctoral scholarship, and an American Council of Learned Societies /Mellon Foundation Dissertation Completion Fellowship. An earlier version of this research was presented at the 2018 American Association of Geographers meeting in New Orleans during a series of sessions titled “Political Geology,” and I am grateful to all who attended and offered feedback. Special thanks to Matthew Himley, Gabriela Valdivia, Donald Moore, and three anonymous reviewers for their feedback at various stages of writing, and to all the archivists and earth scientists with whom I spoke in Bolivia, particularly Edgar Ramírez and Hans Moëller. All errors, of course, are my own.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - This paper examines the relationship between resource nationalism, state territorialization, and geological knowledge production in Bolivia. Focusing on two historical moments of post-revolutionary state-building – post-Independence (1825) and post-National Revolution (1952) - I show how the subterranean was produced as vertical state territory not only in law but also through science. By charting this history, I argue that anti-Indigenous racism was historically built into resource nationalism through ongoing collaborations between earth scientists and various iterations of the Bolivian state. In the post-Independence era, French naturalist Alcide d'Orbigny was hired by the nascent Bolivian state to produce the country's first geological map. His writings, which ranged from the geological to the ethnological, conceptually grafted Indigenous peoples to the surface of the earth while representing the subterranean as empty save for natural resources. In the post-National Revolution era, d'Orbigny's work reemerged as influential when it was taken up by both political theorists and geologists. Through a close examination of works from these two eras, I show how the subsoil became the rationalized realm of the state. I further suggest that the contemporary tension between state-led resource extraction and Bolivia's “plurinational” constitution, which pluralizes the nation and ostensibly supports Indigenous autonomy, can be understood as a spatial tension between the subterranean, which is held in perpetuity by the state, and the surface, which can be owned privately or communally and imbued with place-specific meanings. Although resource nationalism might appear to be a progressive effort to redistribute resource wealth, capable of countering the neoliberal privatization of decades prior, such extractive projects threaten Indigenous territorial rights, compromising the purportedly decolonial goals of the Plurinational State.
AB - This paper examines the relationship between resource nationalism, state territorialization, and geological knowledge production in Bolivia. Focusing on two historical moments of post-revolutionary state-building – post-Independence (1825) and post-National Revolution (1952) - I show how the subterranean was produced as vertical state territory not only in law but also through science. By charting this history, I argue that anti-Indigenous racism was historically built into resource nationalism through ongoing collaborations between earth scientists and various iterations of the Bolivian state. In the post-Independence era, French naturalist Alcide d'Orbigny was hired by the nascent Bolivian state to produce the country's first geological map. His writings, which ranged from the geological to the ethnological, conceptually grafted Indigenous peoples to the surface of the earth while representing the subterranean as empty save for natural resources. In the post-National Revolution era, d'Orbigny's work reemerged as influential when it was taken up by both political theorists and geologists. Through a close examination of works from these two eras, I show how the subsoil became the rationalized realm of the state. I further suggest that the contemporary tension between state-led resource extraction and Bolivia's “plurinational” constitution, which pluralizes the nation and ostensibly supports Indigenous autonomy, can be understood as a spatial tension between the subterranean, which is held in perpetuity by the state, and the surface, which can be owned privately or communally and imbued with place-specific meanings. Although resource nationalism might appear to be a progressive effort to redistribute resource wealth, capable of countering the neoliberal privatization of decades prior, such extractive projects threaten Indigenous territorial rights, compromising the purportedly decolonial goals of the Plurinational State.
KW - Bolivia
KW - Geology
KW - Indigenous autonomy
KW - Latin America
KW - Resource nationalism
KW - Vertical territory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068222239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068222239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102040
DO - 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102040
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85068222239
SN - 0962-6298
VL - 74
JO - Political Geography
JF - Political Geography
M1 - 102040
ER -