TY - JOUR
T1 - Stress, NK cells, and cancer
T2 - Still a promissory note
AU - Ben-Eliyahu, Shamgar
AU - Page, Gayle G.
AU - Schleifer, Steven J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We apologize to those who have made significant contributions in the areas discussed in this mini-review but whose work was not cited due to page and reference limitations. The work of SBE (R01-CA73056 & 2005331) and GGP (NR07742) has been supported by grants from NIH and from the US-Israeli Binational Science Foundation (BSF).
PY - 2007/10
Y1 - 2007/10
N2 - Although the last decades have provided ample evidence for deleterious effects of stress on immunity and on cancer development and suggested mediating mechanisms, no psychoneuroimmunology (PNI)-related intervention has become a standard of care in conventional cancer treatment. We believe the reasons for this include the unique nature of cancer evolvement and interactions with the immune system, and the many conceptual and technical obstacles to studying stress effects on immune activity and their implications for human resistance to malignancy. However, the numerous and diverse interactions between malignant tissue and immunocytes are now better understood, and suggestions can be made with respect to certain critical periods to be investigated in cancer-PNI research. Animal models of cancer progression are instrumental in suggesting neuroendocrine and immunological mediators of stress effects on specific aspects of cancer progression, especially with respect to the role of NK cell activity. The ultimate clinical relevance, however, must be tested in cancer patients. Recent animal studies suggest a role for the sympathetic nervous system in mediating biologically relevant stress effects on immunity and on tumor progression. Related interventions can now be tested in patients to support or refute the promise of such studies.
AB - Although the last decades have provided ample evidence for deleterious effects of stress on immunity and on cancer development and suggested mediating mechanisms, no psychoneuroimmunology (PNI)-related intervention has become a standard of care in conventional cancer treatment. We believe the reasons for this include the unique nature of cancer evolvement and interactions with the immune system, and the many conceptual and technical obstacles to studying stress effects on immune activity and their implications for human resistance to malignancy. However, the numerous and diverse interactions between malignant tissue and immunocytes are now better understood, and suggestions can be made with respect to certain critical periods to be investigated in cancer-PNI research. Animal models of cancer progression are instrumental in suggesting neuroendocrine and immunological mediators of stress effects on specific aspects of cancer progression, especially with respect to the role of NK cell activity. The ultimate clinical relevance, however, must be tested in cancer patients. Recent animal studies suggest a role for the sympathetic nervous system in mediating biologically relevant stress effects on immunity and on tumor progression. Related interventions can now be tested in patients to support or refute the promise of such studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548030911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548030911&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.06.008
DO - 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.06.008
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17662574
AN - SCOPUS:34548030911
SN - 0889-1591
VL - 21
SP - 881
EP - 887
JO - Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
JF - Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
IS - 7
ER -