Taking Stock of Drug Courts: Do They Work?

Matthew W. Logan, Nathan W. Link

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although researchers, policymakers, and practitioners alike have long known about the established link between substance abuse and criminal behavior, criminal justice agencies in the United States are still tasked with managing an influx of individuals who display symptoms of abuse and dependence. By the late 1980s, the drug court model emerged as an innovative response to this problem, and this reform has since proliferated to such an extent that it is the most common type of problem-solving court in America. Still, there remains much variation in how drug courts are implemented across jurisdictions, which can have strong implications for the outcomes among the courts’ participants. In this review, we summarize the key research on drug court implementation, followed by an assessment of whether they can be said to “work” in terms of reducing criminal behavior and relapse among adults. We conclude that the model remains an evidence-based practice and suggest some directions for future work, including increased emphasis on theory and causal dynamics and key measurement issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-298
Number of pages16
JournalVictims and Offenders
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Law

Keywords

  • addiction substance use disorder
  • drug courts
  • evidence-based practice
  • problem-solving courts
  • therapeutic jurisprudence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Taking Stock of Drug Courts: Do They Work?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this