TY - JOUR
T1 - Tapestries of innovation
T2 - Structures of contemporary open source project engagements
AU - Germonprez, Matt
AU - Levy, Matt
AU - Kendall, Julie E.
AU - Kendall, Kenneth E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Digital Technology grant on Open Source Health and Sustainability, Number 8434 (https://sloan.org/grant-detail/8434).
Funding Information:
Matt Germonprez is the Mutual of Omaha Professor of Information Systems in the College of Information Science & Technology at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. He uses qualitative field-studies to research corporate engagement with open communities and the dynamics of design in these engagements. His lines of research have been funded by numerous organizations including the National Science Foundation, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and Mozilla. Matt is the co-founder of the Association for Information Systems SIGOPEN and the Linux Foundation Community Health Analytics OSS Project (CHAOSS). He has had work accepted at Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Journal of Information Technology, Information Systems Journal, Information and Organization, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, OpenSym, Group, HICSS, and ACM Interactions. Matt is an active open source community member, having presented design and development work at LinuxCon, the Open Source Summit North America, the Linux Foundation Open Compliance Summit, the Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit, and the Open Source Leadership Summit.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the Association for Information Systems.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Since the origins of the free-software movement, open source projects have fostered an environment for innovative ideas that has transformed much of our understanding of technology in everyday life. In our quest to learn more about the structures of large-scale contemporary open source engagements, we examine three open source networks as part of an ongoing field study (Van Maanen, 2011). We explore the innovation networks described by Lyytinen, Yoo, & Boland (2016) and resolve whether any of the open source innovative networks that we have been studying can be classified as Project, Clan, Federated, or Anarchic networks. We examine two collaborative open source projects (SPDX and OpenMAMA) housed at the Linux Foundation, and determine that they correspond to the Federated and Project innovation networks respectively. Further, we determined that the Linux Foundation itself, as an organization that houses numerous open source projects, did not fit any of the four types of networks. We therefore propose and authenticate a fifth type of network that we characterize as a Tapestry innovation network, which can illuminate the Linux Foundation’s complexity of horizontal “weft threads” of participating organizations with the vertical, less visible “warp threads” of responsibilities and endeavors. Our study reveals important implications for research and practice by challenging the accepted view of open source projects, which still largely regards engagement around loosely structured groups of volunteers working on publicly available software. It also reveals that foundations are playing increasingly strategic roles in creating and stabilizing open source projects.
AB - Since the origins of the free-software movement, open source projects have fostered an environment for innovative ideas that has transformed much of our understanding of technology in everyday life. In our quest to learn more about the structures of large-scale contemporary open source engagements, we examine three open source networks as part of an ongoing field study (Van Maanen, 2011). We explore the innovation networks described by Lyytinen, Yoo, & Boland (2016) and resolve whether any of the open source innovative networks that we have been studying can be classified as Project, Clan, Federated, or Anarchic networks. We examine two collaborative open source projects (SPDX and OpenMAMA) housed at the Linux Foundation, and determine that they correspond to the Federated and Project innovation networks respectively. Further, we determined that the Linux Foundation itself, as an organization that houses numerous open source projects, did not fit any of the four types of networks. We therefore propose and authenticate a fifth type of network that we characterize as a Tapestry innovation network, which can illuminate the Linux Foundation’s complexity of horizontal “weft threads” of participating organizations with the vertical, less visible “warp threads” of responsibilities and endeavors. Our study reveals important implications for research and practice by challenging the accepted view of open source projects, which still largely regards engagement around loosely structured groups of volunteers working on publicly available software. It also reveals that foundations are playing increasingly strategic roles in creating and stabilizing open source projects.
KW - Federated Innovation
KW - Field Study
KW - Linux Foundation
KW - Networks of Innovation
KW - Open Innovation
KW - Open Source Projects
KW - Project Innovation
KW - Tapestries Innovation Network
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085507656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085507656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.17705/1jais.00615
DO - 10.17705/1jais.00615
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085507656
SN - 1536-9323
VL - 21
SP - 615
EP - 663
JO - Journal of the Association for Information Systems
JF - Journal of the Association for Information Systems
IS - 3
ER -