Abstract
The current study examined special education teachers' ratings of the usefulness of strategy microanalytic assessment (SMA) (i.e., self-regulation, strategy use) and standardized norm-referenced assessment information (SNRA) (i.e., cognitive and academic skills). Ninety-six participants separately rated the frequency with which SMA and SNRA are used in schools and the usefulness of each report [i.e., Teacher Rating Questionnaire (TRQ)] for intervention planning about a case study. A mixed model experimental design revealed that even though SNRA information is more typical of the data provided in evaluation reports/Individualized Educational Programs, the SMA data were rated significantly more helpful than the SNRA for enhancing important school-related outcomes (e.g., test performance) as well as teacher-related roles (e.g., developing instructional plans). Despite the participants' consistent preference for SMA information, their overall TRQ ratings of the SNRA were positive.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 149-155 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Psychology in the Schools |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2006 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Education
- Developmental and Educational Psychology