The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945–1993

Roy Licklider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

462 Scopus citations

Abstract

We know very little about how civil wars end. Harrison Wagner has argued that negotiated settlements of civil wars are likely to break down because segments of power-sharing governments retain the capacity for resorting to civil war while victory destroys the losers’ organization, making it very difficult to resume the war. An analysis of a data set of 91 post-1945 civil wars generally supports this hypothesis but only in wars over identity issues. Moreover, while military victories may be less likely to break down than negotiated settlements of identity civil wars, they are also more likely to be followed by acts of genocide. Outsiders concerned with minimizing violence thus face a dilemma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)681-690
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume89
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1995

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945–1993'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this