The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association

Nathan Tintle, Derek Gordon, Dirk Van Bruggen, Stephen Finch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We consider a modification to the traditional genome wide association (GWA) study design: duplicate genotyping. Duplicate genotyping (re-genotyping some of the samples) has long been suggested for quality control reasons; however, it has not been evaluated for its statistical cost-effectiveness. We demonstrate that when genotyping error rates are at least m%, duplicate genotyping provides a cost-effective (more statistical power for the same price) design alternative when relative genotype to phenotype/sample acquisition costs are no more than m%. In addition to cost and error rate, duplicate genotyping is most cost-effective for SNPs with low minor allele frequency. In general, relative genotype to phenotype/sample acquisition costs will be low when following up a limited number of SNPs in the second stage of a two-stage GWA study design, and, thus, duplicate genotyping may be useful in these situations. In cases where many SNPs are being followed up at the second stage, duplicate genotyping only low-quality SNPs with low minor allele frequency may be cost-effective. We also find that in almost all cases where duplicate genotyping is cost-effective, the most cost-effective design strategy involves duplicate genotyping all samples. Free software is provided which evaluates the cost-effectiveness of duplicate genotyping based on user inputs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-378
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Human Genetics
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 8 2009

Fingerprint

Genetic Testing
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Genome-Wide Association Study
Gene Frequency
Genotype
Phenotype
Quality Control
Software

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Keywords

  • Duplicate genotype
  • Genome-wide association study
  • Genotype error
  • Power
  • Re-genotype
  • Two-stage

Cite this

Tintle, Nathan ; Gordon, Derek ; Van Bruggen, Dirk ; Finch, Stephen. / The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association. In: Annals of Human Genetics. 2009 ; Vol. 73, No. 3. pp. 370-378.
@article{d6a8e63c13504da2aff75be4f49fae43,
title = "The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association",
abstract = "We consider a modification to the traditional genome wide association (GWA) study design: duplicate genotyping. Duplicate genotyping (re-genotyping some of the samples) has long been suggested for quality control reasons; however, it has not been evaluated for its statistical cost-effectiveness. We demonstrate that when genotyping error rates are at least m{\%}, duplicate genotyping provides a cost-effective (more statistical power for the same price) design alternative when relative genotype to phenotype/sample acquisition costs are no more than m{\%}. In addition to cost and error rate, duplicate genotyping is most cost-effective for SNPs with low minor allele frequency. In general, relative genotype to phenotype/sample acquisition costs will be low when following up a limited number of SNPs in the second stage of a two-stage GWA study design, and, thus, duplicate genotyping may be useful in these situations. In cases where many SNPs are being followed up at the second stage, duplicate genotyping only low-quality SNPs with low minor allele frequency may be cost-effective. We also find that in almost all cases where duplicate genotyping is cost-effective, the most cost-effective design strategy involves duplicate genotyping all samples. Free software is provided which evaluates the cost-effectiveness of duplicate genotyping based on user inputs.",
keywords = "Duplicate genotype, Genome-wide association study, Genotype error, Power, Re-genotype, Two-stage",
author = "Nathan Tintle and Derek Gordon and {Van Bruggen}, Dirk and Stephen Finch",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00516.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "370--378",
journal = "Annals of Human Genetics",
issn = "0003-4800",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association. / Tintle, Nathan; Gordon, Derek; Van Bruggen, Dirk; Finch, Stephen.

In: Annals of Human Genetics, Vol. 73, No. 3, 08.05.2009, p. 370-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association

AU - Tintle, Nathan

AU - Gordon, Derek

AU - Van Bruggen, Dirk

AU - Finch, Stephen

PY - 2009/5/8

Y1 - 2009/5/8

N2 - We consider a modification to the traditional genome wide association (GWA) study design: duplicate genotyping. Duplicate genotyping (re-genotyping some of the samples) has long been suggested for quality control reasons; however, it has not been evaluated for its statistical cost-effectiveness. We demonstrate that when genotyping error rates are at least m%, duplicate genotyping provides a cost-effective (more statistical power for the same price) design alternative when relative genotype to phenotype/sample acquisition costs are no more than m%. In addition to cost and error rate, duplicate genotyping is most cost-effective for SNPs with low minor allele frequency. In general, relative genotype to phenotype/sample acquisition costs will be low when following up a limited number of SNPs in the second stage of a two-stage GWA study design, and, thus, duplicate genotyping may be useful in these situations. In cases where many SNPs are being followed up at the second stage, duplicate genotyping only low-quality SNPs with low minor allele frequency may be cost-effective. We also find that in almost all cases where duplicate genotyping is cost-effective, the most cost-effective design strategy involves duplicate genotyping all samples. Free software is provided which evaluates the cost-effectiveness of duplicate genotyping based on user inputs.

AB - We consider a modification to the traditional genome wide association (GWA) study design: duplicate genotyping. Duplicate genotyping (re-genotyping some of the samples) has long been suggested for quality control reasons; however, it has not been evaluated for its statistical cost-effectiveness. We demonstrate that when genotyping error rates are at least m%, duplicate genotyping provides a cost-effective (more statistical power for the same price) design alternative when relative genotype to phenotype/sample acquisition costs are no more than m%. In addition to cost and error rate, duplicate genotyping is most cost-effective for SNPs with low minor allele frequency. In general, relative genotype to phenotype/sample acquisition costs will be low when following up a limited number of SNPs in the second stage of a two-stage GWA study design, and, thus, duplicate genotyping may be useful in these situations. In cases where many SNPs are being followed up at the second stage, duplicate genotyping only low-quality SNPs with low minor allele frequency may be cost-effective. We also find that in almost all cases where duplicate genotyping is cost-effective, the most cost-effective design strategy involves duplicate genotyping all samples. Free software is provided which evaluates the cost-effectiveness of duplicate genotyping based on user inputs.

KW - Duplicate genotype

KW - Genome-wide association study

KW - Genotype error

KW - Power

KW - Re-genotype

KW - Two-stage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65449170784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65449170784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00516.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00516.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19344449

AN - SCOPUS:65449170784

VL - 73

SP - 370

EP - 378

JO - Annals of Human Genetics

JF - Annals of Human Genetics

SN - 0003-4800

IS - 3

ER -