The demise of PTSD

From governing through trauma to governing resilience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article raises questions about the possible waning of the authority of the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While avoiding predictions, it points to signs that the authority of PTSD is now being challenged by both the rise of resilience-based models and the increasing authority of biomedical and neurological approaches in the governance of trauma. It explores these challenges in various empirical sites, including humanitarian interventions, Western military settings (especially involving the US Army and North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]), as well as civilian contexts, including national health services, emergency preparedness, schools, universities, and other sectors. The article concludes by stressing some of the troubling politics that surround these new developments, which, like the diagnosis of PTSD, may individualize and govern the experience of traumatic events, including war, in a broad context of social and economic austerity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-226
Number of pages13
JournalAlternatives
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012

Fingerprint

posttraumatic stress disorder
resilience
trauma
humanitarian intervention
NATO
military
health service
Military
governance
politics
event
university
school
economics
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Keywords

  • humanitarian intervention
  • military mental health
  • posttraumatic stress disorder
  • resilience
  • trauma

Cite this

@article{29c5fad833f94ab4bcbd26975dbe357c,
title = "The demise of PTSD: From governing through trauma to governing resilience",
abstract = "This article raises questions about the possible waning of the authority of the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While avoiding predictions, it points to signs that the authority of PTSD is now being challenged by both the rise of resilience-based models and the increasing authority of biomedical and neurological approaches in the governance of trauma. It explores these challenges in various empirical sites, including humanitarian interventions, Western military settings (especially involving the US Army and North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]), as well as civilian contexts, including national health services, emergency preparedness, schools, universities, and other sectors. The article concludes by stressing some of the troubling politics that surround these new developments, which, like the diagnosis of PTSD, may individualize and govern the experience of traumatic events, including war, in a broad context of social and economic austerity.",
keywords = "humanitarian intervention, military mental health, posttraumatic stress disorder, resilience, trauma",
author = "Alison Howell",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0304375412450842",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "214--226",
journal = "Alternatives",
issn = "0304-3754",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

The demise of PTSD : From governing through trauma to governing resilience. / Howell, Alison.

In: Alternatives, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.08.2012, p. 214-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The demise of PTSD

T2 - From governing through trauma to governing resilience

AU - Howell, Alison

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - This article raises questions about the possible waning of the authority of the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While avoiding predictions, it points to signs that the authority of PTSD is now being challenged by both the rise of resilience-based models and the increasing authority of biomedical and neurological approaches in the governance of trauma. It explores these challenges in various empirical sites, including humanitarian interventions, Western military settings (especially involving the US Army and North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]), as well as civilian contexts, including national health services, emergency preparedness, schools, universities, and other sectors. The article concludes by stressing some of the troubling politics that surround these new developments, which, like the diagnosis of PTSD, may individualize and govern the experience of traumatic events, including war, in a broad context of social and economic austerity.

AB - This article raises questions about the possible waning of the authority of the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While avoiding predictions, it points to signs that the authority of PTSD is now being challenged by both the rise of resilience-based models and the increasing authority of biomedical and neurological approaches in the governance of trauma. It explores these challenges in various empirical sites, including humanitarian interventions, Western military settings (especially involving the US Army and North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]), as well as civilian contexts, including national health services, emergency preparedness, schools, universities, and other sectors. The article concludes by stressing some of the troubling politics that surround these new developments, which, like the diagnosis of PTSD, may individualize and govern the experience of traumatic events, including war, in a broad context of social and economic austerity.

KW - humanitarian intervention

KW - military mental health

KW - posttraumatic stress disorder

KW - resilience

KW - trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873890473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873890473&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0304375412450842

DO - 10.1177/0304375412450842

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 214

EP - 226

JO - Alternatives

JF - Alternatives

SN - 0304-3754

IS - 3

ER -