The Effect of Campaign-Generated Interpersonal Communication on Campaign-Targeted Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

Michelle Jeong, Rosie Eungyuhl Bae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined the effect of mass media campaign-generated conversations on campaign-targeted health outcomes, via a systematic meta-analysis of 28 studies (including 124 sub-studies and a total of 138,898 participants). The study also conducted a series of moderation analyses to examine the conditions under which interpersonal communication has larger effects on bringing about the desired outcomes. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate that campaign-generated conversations have a positive effect on inducing campaign-targeted outcomes (OR = 1.28) and show that this effect is moderated by health topic addressed by the campaign, the type of outcome being targeted by the campaign, and with whom people converse, along with several other campaign-relevant and study-relevant variables. The implications of these findings for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)988-1003
Number of pages16
JournalHealth Communication
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 3 2018
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Effect of Campaign-Generated Interpersonal Communication on Campaign-Targeted Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this