The Glass-Steagall Act in historical perspective

Larry Neal, Eugene N. White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Implementation of Volcker's Rule requires a historical perspective on the original Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 that separated commercial banking from investment banks in the United States. Like the Dodd-Frank legislation, the Banking Act of 1933 was passed before full analysis of the financial crisis was possible. The intended consequences of Glass-Steagall made Federal deposit insurance feasible by limiting entry of new banks while preserving unit banking. The unintended consequences, however, cut off access by small- and medium-size enterprises to external finance and also reduced the capital base for investment banks. Despite these harmful effects, the American economy did recover eventually.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-113
Number of pages10
JournalQuarterly Review of Economics and Finance
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Keywords

  • Commercial bank
  • Deposit insurance
  • Financial regulation
  • Glass-Steagall Act
  • Investment banks
  • Volcker rule

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Glass-Steagall Act in historical perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this