Abstract
Implementation of Volcker's Rule requires a historical perspective on the original Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 that separated commercial banking from investment banks in the United States. Like the Dodd-Frank legislation, the Banking Act of 1933 was passed before full analysis of the financial crisis was possible. The intended consequences of Glass-Steagall made Federal deposit insurance feasible by limiting entry of new banks while preserving unit banking. The unintended consequences, however, cut off access by small- and medium-size enterprises to external finance and also reduced the capital base for investment banks. Despite these harmful effects, the American economy did recover eventually.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 104-113 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2012 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Commercial bank
- Deposit insurance
- Financial regulation
- Glass-Steagall Act
- Investment banks
- Volcker rule