The goodness of judgment index

Lee Jussim

doi:10.1017/S0140525X04390084

The goodness of judgment index

Lee Jussim

School of Arts and Sciences, Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Evidence is presented indicating that mainstream social psychology material leads undergraduates to conclude that people are irrational. To help address the problems identified by Krueger & Funder (K&F), a new statistic, the Goodness of Judgment Index (GJI), is presented. A concrete example based on a recent study is used to show how the GJI can be used to bring some balance back to research emphasizing error and bias.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	344-345
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	27
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04390084
State	Published - Jun 2004

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X04390084

Cite this

@article{ad862673cf51465e89ba8895977c51ef,

title = "The goodness of judgment index",

abstract = "Evidence is presented indicating that mainstream social psychology material leads undergraduates to conclude that people are irrational. To help address the problems identified by Krueger & Funder (K&F), a new statistic, the Goodness of Judgment Index (GJI), is presented. A concrete example based on a recent study is used to show how the GJI can be used to bring some balance back to research emphasizing error and bias.",

author = "Lee Jussim",

year = "2004",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X04390084",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "27",

pages = "344--345",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The goodness of judgment index

AU - Jussim, Lee

PY - 2004/6

Y1 - 2004/6

N2 - Evidence is presented indicating that mainstream social psychology material leads undergraduates to conclude that people are irrational. To help address the problems identified by Krueger & Funder (K&F), a new statistic, the Goodness of Judgment Index (GJI), is presented. A concrete example based on a recent study is used to show how the GJI can be used to bring some balance back to research emphasizing error and bias.

AB - Evidence is presented indicating that mainstream social psychology material leads undergraduates to conclude that people are irrational. To help address the problems identified by Krueger & Funder (K&F), a new statistic, the Goodness of Judgment Index (GJI), is presented. A concrete example based on a recent study is used to show how the GJI can be used to bring some balance back to research emphasizing error and bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12444331015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12444331015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X04390084

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X04390084

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:12444331015

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 27

SP - 344

EP - 345

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

IS - 3

ER -

The goodness of judgment index

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this