TY - JOUR
T1 - The Happiness-Energy Paradox
T2 - Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being
AU - Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam
AU - Altman, Micah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) and Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Earth’s per capita energy use continues to grow, despite technological advances and widespread calls for reduction in energy consumption. The negative environmental consequences are well known: resource depletion, pollution, and global warming. However many remain reluctant to cut energy consumption because of the widespread, although, implicit, belief that a nation’s well being depends on its energy consumption. This article systematically examines the evidential support for the relationship between energy use and subjective well-being at the societal level, by integrating data from multiple sources, collected at multiple levels of government, and spanning four decades. This analysis reveals, surprisingly, that the most common measure of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, is unrelated to energy use -- whether measured at the national, state or county level. The nil relationship between happiness and energy use is reminiscent of the well-known Easterlin Paradox, however the causal mechanisms responsible to each remain in question. We discuss the possible causes for the Happiness-Energy paradox and potential policy implications.
AB - Earth’s per capita energy use continues to grow, despite technological advances and widespread calls for reduction in energy consumption. The negative environmental consequences are well known: resource depletion, pollution, and global warming. However many remain reluctant to cut energy consumption because of the widespread, although, implicit, belief that a nation’s well being depends on its energy consumption. This article systematically examines the evidential support for the relationship between energy use and subjective well-being at the societal level, by integrating data from multiple sources, collected at multiple levels of government, and spanning four decades. This analysis reveals, surprisingly, that the most common measure of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, is unrelated to energy use -- whether measured at the national, state or county level. The nil relationship between happiness and energy use is reminiscent of the well-known Easterlin Paradox, however the causal mechanisms responsible to each remain in question. We discuss the possible causes for the Happiness-Energy paradox and potential policy implications.
KW - Energy consumption
KW - Energy intensity of economy
KW - Energy use
KW - Happiness
KW - Life satisfaction
KW - Subjective well-being (SWB)
KW - Sustainability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062945308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062945308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11482-019-09719-y
DO - 10.1007/s11482-019-09719-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85062945308
SN - 1871-2584
VL - 15
SP - 1055
EP - 1067
JO - Applied Research in Quality of Life
JF - Applied Research in Quality of Life
IS - 4
ER -