The importance of contextual variables when judging fairness: An examination of counterfactual thoughts and fairness theory

Jessica M. Nicklin, Rebecca Greenbaum, Laurel A. McNall, Robert Folger, Kevin J. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research empirically examines the underlying mechanisms of fairness theory (Folger & Cropanzano, 1998, 2001), namely counterfactual thought processes. Study 1 used a policy-capturing design to examine the relative importance of contextual variables in predicting counterfactual thoughts and fairness perceptions. Study 2 utilized a between-subjects design and asked participants to generate their own counterfactuals in response to an unfortunate event. Results of both studies showed that fairness perceptions are influenced by contextual variables (i.e., outcome severity, target knowledge and expertise, sin of commission vs. omission) and counterfactual thinking. Counterfactual thoughts partially mediated the effects of contextual variables and fairness perceptions in Study 1. Exploratory analyses from Study 3 revealed that the measurement of counterfactual thoughts (frequency vs. strength) may capture different underlying constructs. Implications are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-141
Number of pages15
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume114
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Keywords

  • Counterfactual thinking
  • Fairness perceptions
  • Organizational justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of contextual variables when judging fairness: An examination of counterfactual thoughts and fairness theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this