The influence of presentation order on category transfer

Fabien Mathy, Jacob Feldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study of supervised categorization shows how different kinds of category representations are influenced by the order in which training examples are presented. We used the well-studied 5-4 category structure of Medin and Schaffer (1978), which allows transfer of category learning to new stimuli to be discriminated as a function of rule-based or similarity-based category knowledge. In the rule-based training condition (thought to facilitate the learning of abstract logical rules and hypothesized to produce rule-based classification), items were grouped by subcategories and randomized within each subcategory. In the similarity-based training condition (thought to facilitate associative learning and hypothesized to produce exemplar classification), transitions between items within the same category were determined by their featural similarity and subcategories were ignored. We found that transfer patterns depended on whether the presentation order was similarity-based, or rule-based, with the participants particularly capitalizing on the rule-based order.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-69
Number of pages11
JournalExperimental Psychology
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Learning
Transfer (Psychology)
Subcategories
Category Learning
Category Structure
Stimulus
Associative Learning
Logic

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Keywords

  • Categorization
  • Presentation order
  • Similarity rule

Cite this

@article{a033322c754440788e2228a2d514151a,
title = "The influence of presentation order on category transfer",
abstract = "This study of supervised categorization shows how different kinds of category representations are influenced by the order in which training examples are presented. We used the well-studied 5-4 category structure of Medin and Schaffer (1978), which allows transfer of category learning to new stimuli to be discriminated as a function of rule-based or similarity-based category knowledge. In the rule-based training condition (thought to facilitate the learning of abstract logical rules and hypothesized to produce rule-based classification), items were grouped by subcategories and randomized within each subcategory. In the similarity-based training condition (thought to facilitate associative learning and hypothesized to produce exemplar classification), transitions between items within the same category were determined by their featural similarity and subcategories were ignored. We found that transfer patterns depended on whether the presentation order was similarity-based, or rule-based, with the participants particularly capitalizing on the rule-based order.",
keywords = "Categorization, Presentation order, Similarity rule",
author = "Fabien Mathy and Jacob Feldman",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1027/1618-3169/a000312",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "59--69",
journal = "Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1618-3169",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "1",

}

The influence of presentation order on category transfer. / Mathy, Fabien; Feldman, Jacob.

In: Experimental Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 59-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of presentation order on category transfer

AU - Mathy, Fabien

AU - Feldman, Jacob

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This study of supervised categorization shows how different kinds of category representations are influenced by the order in which training examples are presented. We used the well-studied 5-4 category structure of Medin and Schaffer (1978), which allows transfer of category learning to new stimuli to be discriminated as a function of rule-based or similarity-based category knowledge. In the rule-based training condition (thought to facilitate the learning of abstract logical rules and hypothesized to produce rule-based classification), items were grouped by subcategories and randomized within each subcategory. In the similarity-based training condition (thought to facilitate associative learning and hypothesized to produce exemplar classification), transitions between items within the same category were determined by their featural similarity and subcategories were ignored. We found that transfer patterns depended on whether the presentation order was similarity-based, or rule-based, with the participants particularly capitalizing on the rule-based order.

AB - This study of supervised categorization shows how different kinds of category representations are influenced by the order in which training examples are presented. We used the well-studied 5-4 category structure of Medin and Schaffer (1978), which allows transfer of category learning to new stimuli to be discriminated as a function of rule-based or similarity-based category knowledge. In the rule-based training condition (thought to facilitate the learning of abstract logical rules and hypothesized to produce rule-based classification), items were grouped by subcategories and randomized within each subcategory. In the similarity-based training condition (thought to facilitate associative learning and hypothesized to produce exemplar classification), transitions between items within the same category were determined by their featural similarity and subcategories were ignored. We found that transfer patterns depended on whether the presentation order was similarity-based, or rule-based, with the participants particularly capitalizing on the rule-based order.

KW - Categorization

KW - Presentation order

KW - Similarity rule

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964055117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964055117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000312

DO - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000312

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 59

EP - 69

JO - Experimental Psychology

JF - Experimental Psychology

SN - 1618-3169

IS - 1

ER -