The influence of technical violation revocations on parole efficacy: employing competing risks survival analyses to address methodological challenges

Michael Ostermann, Jordan M. Hyatt, Samuel E. DeWitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Failures among the community supervision population are a major contributor to prison populations. Revocations of parole supervision due to technical parole violations (TPRs) often result in the incarceration of a parolee for violating the terms of their supervised release. This study employs several strategies for integrating TPRs into the construct of recidivism, a common outcome measure in correctional evaluations. TPRs are either ignored, combined with rearrest, or treated as a competing risk to rearrest. Each framework is employed to estimate survival rates among multi-year prison release cohorts in which parolee supervision is stratified by actuarial risk level. Results suggest that the way TPRs are integrated into evaluations of parolee recidivistic behavior patterns can influence the magnitude and nature of a study’s results. This is significant as costly policy decisions are often informed by evaluation research focusing on time to failure measures. Methodological and ideological remedies are proposed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-341
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Crime and Justice
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 26 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Keywords

  • Competing risks
  • Corrections
  • Recidivism
  • Survival Analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of technical violation revocations on parole efficacy: employing competing risks survival analyses to address methodological challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this