The Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis: development and testing.

C. Thomas-Hawkins, J. Fawcett, L. Tulman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Development and psychometric testing of the Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis (IFS-Dialysis), which was designed to measure functional status in persons who are receiving chronic incenter hemodialysis treatment. DESIGN: Three-phase instrument development design: Phase 1--content validity assessment; Phase 2--examination of internal consistency reliability; Phase 3--examination of construct validity. SAMPLE/SETTING: 175 chronic hemodialysis patients recruited from an urban, free-standing, outpatient dialysis center. METHODS: Content validity was determined using Popham's average congruency proceudre. Internal consistency reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Construct validity was examined by bivariate correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) in a subsample of 60 patients. RESULTS: Content validity was established at 90%. The alpha reliability coefficient for the IFS-Dialysis was 0.86. Subscale alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71-0.82. Correlation between the IFS-Dialysis and the KPS was 0.55. Correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.14-0.53. CONCLUSIONS: The IFS-Dialysis has acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and initial construct validity. Use of the IFS-Dialysis in clinical practice is appropriate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-490
Number of pages8
JournalANNA journal / American Nephrology Nurses' Association
Volume25
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 1998
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis: development and testing.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this