“The Man That Was a Thing”: Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Photographic Vision, and the Portrayal of Race in the Nineteenth Century

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This essay explores the spectacle cast of race in nineteenth-century American literature and culture by way of highlighting an impulse in white writing to represent black figures according to a cultural materialism rooted in the invention of the daguerreotype in 1839. Specifically, it explores the cultural force of daguerreotypy on nineteenth-century US literary and visual portrait cultures. Taking Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin for its touchstone text, “The Man That Was a Thing” argues that under the sway of visual portrait making on the unconscious of US law and literature, the black slave subject like Uncle Tom was portrayed not so much as a person debased into property (as we routinely imagine) so much as living property, a half-thing, made to seem alternately like a person in the sentimental interests of (white) democratic thought. In other words, in Stowe, both the doubly literary and juridical effects of racialized vision on the question of human being follow from a strange technology of words and thought in US law that granted the slave two bodies in early American legal history, as it were – one personal, the other thingly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRace in American Literature and Culture
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages262-275
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781108766654
ISBN (Print)9781108487399
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2022
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Keywords

  • Daguerreotypy
  • Fugitive property
  • J. T. Zealy
  • Legal personhood
  • Marcus Root
  • Thing theory
  • Uncle Tom's Cabin (Stowe)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“The Man That Was a Thing”: Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Photographic Vision, and the Portrayal of Race in the Nineteenth Century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this