The meaning and measure of policy metaphors

Mark Schlesinger, Richard Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The apparent ability of the American public to form coherent assessments of policy options - while being largely ignorant of political institutions, actors, and ideology - remains a persistent puzzle for political science. We develop a theory of political decision making that helps resolve this puzzle. We postulate that both the public and political elites comprehend complex policies in part through "reasoning by policy metaphor," which involves comparisons between proposed alternative policies and more readily understood social institutions. Using data from 169 intensive interviews, we test claims about metaphorical reasoning for a particularly complex policy domain: health care reform. We demonstrate that our hypothesized policy metaphors are coherent to both elites and the general public, including the least sophisticated members of the public. We further show that elites and the public share a common understanding of the relevant policy metaphors, that metaphorical reasoning differs from other forms of analogic reasoning, and that metaphorical cognition is distinct from ideological orientation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)611-626
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume94
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

metaphor
elite
political decision making
social institution
political elite
political institution
political science
cognition
ideology
health care
reform
ability
interview

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Schlesinger, Mark ; Lau, Richard. / The meaning and measure of policy metaphors. In: American Political Science Review. 2000 ; Vol. 94, No. 3. pp. 611-626.
@article{429151e79d2a4e3aa84f3878f5fd3b9d,
title = "The meaning and measure of policy metaphors",
abstract = "The apparent ability of the American public to form coherent assessments of policy options - while being largely ignorant of political institutions, actors, and ideology - remains a persistent puzzle for political science. We develop a theory of political decision making that helps resolve this puzzle. We postulate that both the public and political elites comprehend complex policies in part through {"}reasoning by policy metaphor,{"} which involves comparisons between proposed alternative policies and more readily understood social institutions. Using data from 169 intensive interviews, we test claims about metaphorical reasoning for a particularly complex policy domain: health care reform. We demonstrate that our hypothesized policy metaphors are coherent to both elites and the general public, including the least sophisticated members of the public. We further show that elites and the public share a common understanding of the relevant policy metaphors, that metaphorical reasoning differs from other forms of analogic reasoning, and that metaphorical cognition is distinct from ideological orientation.",
author = "Mark Schlesinger and Richard Lau",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/2585834",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "611--626",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

The meaning and measure of policy metaphors. / Schlesinger, Mark; Lau, Richard.

In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, 01.01.2000, p. 611-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The meaning and measure of policy metaphors

AU - Schlesinger, Mark

AU - Lau, Richard

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The apparent ability of the American public to form coherent assessments of policy options - while being largely ignorant of political institutions, actors, and ideology - remains a persistent puzzle for political science. We develop a theory of political decision making that helps resolve this puzzle. We postulate that both the public and political elites comprehend complex policies in part through "reasoning by policy metaphor," which involves comparisons between proposed alternative policies and more readily understood social institutions. Using data from 169 intensive interviews, we test claims about metaphorical reasoning for a particularly complex policy domain: health care reform. We demonstrate that our hypothesized policy metaphors are coherent to both elites and the general public, including the least sophisticated members of the public. We further show that elites and the public share a common understanding of the relevant policy metaphors, that metaphorical reasoning differs from other forms of analogic reasoning, and that metaphorical cognition is distinct from ideological orientation.

AB - The apparent ability of the American public to form coherent assessments of policy options - while being largely ignorant of political institutions, actors, and ideology - remains a persistent puzzle for political science. We develop a theory of political decision making that helps resolve this puzzle. We postulate that both the public and political elites comprehend complex policies in part through "reasoning by policy metaphor," which involves comparisons between proposed alternative policies and more readily understood social institutions. Using data from 169 intensive interviews, we test claims about metaphorical reasoning for a particularly complex policy domain: health care reform. We demonstrate that our hypothesized policy metaphors are coherent to both elites and the general public, including the least sophisticated members of the public. We further show that elites and the public share a common understanding of the relevant policy metaphors, that metaphorical reasoning differs from other forms of analogic reasoning, and that metaphorical cognition is distinct from ideological orientation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040003909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040003909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2585834

DO - 10.2307/2585834

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0040003909

VL - 94

SP - 611

EP - 626

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 3

ER -