The Nature of Stereotypes: A Comparison and Integration of Three Theories

Lee Jussim, Lerita M. Coleman, Lauren Lerch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

218 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present research we examined predictions derived from the following three theoretical approaches to stereotyping: complexity-extremity theory, assumed characteristics theory, and expectancy-violation theory. In order to assess these predictions, we manipulated the race, personal appearance, and dialect style of target job applicants. White judges rated these applicants on a set of characteristics relevant to hiring decisions. Results were consistent with all three theories. Specifically, the range of judges' evaluations of black applicants was larger than the range of their evaluations of white applicants; the effects of personal appearance and dialect style were larger than the effects of race; and black applicants, on average, received more favorable ratings than white applicants. We present a model integrating all three perspectives, and we demonstrate its usefulness for explaining our results and for understanding past research on stereotypes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)536-546
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1987

Fingerprint

applicant
stereotype
Stereotyping
Research
Extremities
dialect
hiring
evaluation
rating

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{cd069306c4a945308b6a67dff32b08a9,
title = "The Nature of Stereotypes: A Comparison and Integration of Three Theories",
abstract = "In the present research we examined predictions derived from the following three theoretical approaches to stereotyping: complexity-extremity theory, assumed characteristics theory, and expectancy-violation theory. In order to assess these predictions, we manipulated the race, personal appearance, and dialect style of target job applicants. White judges rated these applicants on a set of characteristics relevant to hiring decisions. Results were consistent with all three theories. Specifically, the range of judges' evaluations of black applicants was larger than the range of their evaluations of white applicants; the effects of personal appearance and dialect style were larger than the effects of race; and black applicants, on average, received more favorable ratings than white applicants. We present a model integrating all three perspectives, and we demonstrate its usefulness for explaining our results and for understanding past research on stereotypes.",
author = "Lee Jussim and Coleman, {Lerita M.} and Lauren Lerch",
year = "1987",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "536--546",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

The Nature of Stereotypes : A Comparison and Integration of Three Theories. / Jussim, Lee; Coleman, Lerita M.; Lerch, Lauren.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 3, 01.01.1987, p. 536-546.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Nature of Stereotypes

T2 - A Comparison and Integration of Three Theories

AU - Jussim, Lee

AU - Coleman, Lerita M.

AU - Lerch, Lauren

PY - 1987/1/1

Y1 - 1987/1/1

N2 - In the present research we examined predictions derived from the following three theoretical approaches to stereotyping: complexity-extremity theory, assumed characteristics theory, and expectancy-violation theory. In order to assess these predictions, we manipulated the race, personal appearance, and dialect style of target job applicants. White judges rated these applicants on a set of characteristics relevant to hiring decisions. Results were consistent with all three theories. Specifically, the range of judges' evaluations of black applicants was larger than the range of their evaluations of white applicants; the effects of personal appearance and dialect style were larger than the effects of race; and black applicants, on average, received more favorable ratings than white applicants. We present a model integrating all three perspectives, and we demonstrate its usefulness for explaining our results and for understanding past research on stereotypes.

AB - In the present research we examined predictions derived from the following three theoretical approaches to stereotyping: complexity-extremity theory, assumed characteristics theory, and expectancy-violation theory. In order to assess these predictions, we manipulated the race, personal appearance, and dialect style of target job applicants. White judges rated these applicants on a set of characteristics relevant to hiring decisions. Results were consistent with all three theories. Specifically, the range of judges' evaluations of black applicants was larger than the range of their evaluations of white applicants; the effects of personal appearance and dialect style were larger than the effects of race; and black applicants, on average, received more favorable ratings than white applicants. We present a model integrating all three perspectives, and we demonstrate its usefulness for explaining our results and for understanding past research on stereotypes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001039631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001039631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001039631

VL - 52

SP - 536

EP - 546

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -