The nature of stereotypes II: A multiple-process model of evaluations

Lee Jussim, Christopher J. Fleming, Lerita Coleman, Cortney Kohberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


A model integrating 3 theoretical perspectives regarding how stereotypes influence person perception was tested. The theories included evaluative extremity theories, assumed characteristics theory, and expectancy violation theory. Predictions were assessed by manipulating the ethnicity, personal appearance, and speech style of target job applicants. These applicants were rated by 109 judges. Results showed that: (a) Judges evaluated job applicants far more on the basis of their personal appearance and speech style than on the basis of their ethnicity; (b) the range of evaluations of African American applicants was larger than the range of evaluations of White applicants; and (c) overall, judges evaluated the African American applicants more favorably than the White applicants. Results strongly supported the model integrating the 3 theories. We discuss the applicability of the model to other research and naturalistic situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-312
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Feb 15 1996

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology


Dive into the research topics of 'The nature of stereotypes II: A multiple-process model of evaluations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this