The optimal atmospheric CO2 concentration for the growth of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined the optimal atmospheric CO2 concentration of the CO2 fertilization effect on the growth of winter wheat with growth chambers where the CO2 concentration was controlled at 400, 600, 800, 1000, and 1200ppm respectively. I found that initial increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration dramatically enhanced winter wheat growth through the CO2 fertilization effect. However, this CO2 fertilization effect was substantially compromised with further increase in CO2 concentration, demonstrating an optimal CO2 concentration of 889.6, 909.4, and 894.2ppm for aboveground, belowground, and total biomass, respectively, and 967.8ppm for leaf photosynthesis. Also, high CO2 concentrations exceeding the optima not only reduced leaf stomatal density, length and conductance, but also changed the spatial distribution pattern of stomata on leaves. In addition, high CO2 concentration also decreased the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) and the maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) of leaf photosynthesis. However, the high CO2 concentration had little effect on leaf length and plant height. The optimal CO2 fertilization effect found in this study can be used as an indicator in selecting and breeding new wheat strains in adapting to future high atmospheric CO2 concentrations and climate change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)89-97
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Plant Physiology
Volume184
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Keywords

  • Biomass
  • CO fertilization effect
  • Photosynthesis
  • Stomatal conductance
  • Stomatal density
  • Stomatal distribution pattern

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The optimal atmospheric CO2 concentration for the growth of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this