The pace of progress at superfund sites: Policy goals and interest group influence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Scopus citations


Bureaucracies may set priorities for their workload in response to social goals or pressures from concentrated private interests. This paper explores bureaucratic priorities empirically by studying Superfund, the federal program for cleaning up contaminated sites. It examines the amount of time that sites on Superfund's National Priorities List require to complete three stages from listing to cleanup, using an econometric method for multiple sequential durations. The empirical results provide little evidence that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) prioritizes sites according to their harms. By contrast, concentrated private interests, such as liable parties and local communities, play an important role in the EPA's priorities. Delays caused by liable parties may reduce net benefits of cleanup by 8 percent. This result suggests a benefit from funding provision of environmental quality and other public goods through diffuse sources, such as broad-based taxes, to avoid the detrimental effects of such concentrated interests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)315-344
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Law and Economics
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2001

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The pace of progress at superfund sites: Policy goals and interest group influence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this