TY - GEN
T1 - The Rutgers Law Library U.S. Congressional documents digitization collection
AU - Joergensen, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The authors and IOS Press.
PY - 2019/7/10
Y1 - 2019/7/10
N2 - The motivations and processes developed at Rutgers Law Library for digitizing their print collection of United States Congressional hearings and committee prints, dating from 1967 to 2000 are discussed in this Chapter. Both the technical and collection goals of the project, and the important practical details of how it is being accomplished are described. The main theoretical goal was to show how a large scale digitization project could result in a useable, good quality, and sustainable collection while keeping costs at a scale that many institutions might consider affordable. The collection consists of over 25,000 documents. They are committee hearings and other print material that are generated as part of the U.S. Congress' legislative and oversight roles. Although the materials have been unbound, scanned, and checked for quality by hand, most other processes have been automated to minimize cost. Equipment and other expenses have also been kept to a minimum, but without compromise to overall readability, and archival quality.
AB - The motivations and processes developed at Rutgers Law Library for digitizing their print collection of United States Congressional hearings and committee prints, dating from 1967 to 2000 are discussed in this Chapter. Both the technical and collection goals of the project, and the important practical details of how it is being accomplished are described. The main theoretical goal was to show how a large scale digitization project could result in a useable, good quality, and sustainable collection while keeping costs at a scale that many institutions might consider affordable. The collection consists of over 25,000 documents. They are committee hearings and other print material that are generated as part of the U.S. Congress' legislative and oversight roles. Although the materials have been unbound, scanned, and checked for quality by hand, most other processes have been automated to minimize cost. Equipment and other expenses have also been kept to a minimum, but without compromise to overall readability, and archival quality.
KW - Digitization: cost-effectiveness and practicality
KW - Law library
KW - U.S. congressional documents
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85071023479
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85071023479#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3233/FAIA190025
DO - 10.3233/FAIA190025
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85071023479
T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
SP - 237
EP - 249
BT - Knowledge of the Law in the Big Data Age
A2 - Peruginelli, Ginevra
A2 - Faro, Sebastiano
PB - IOS Press BV
T2 - 2018 International Conference on Law via the Internet
Y2 - 11 October 2018 through 12 October 2018
ER -