Abstract
Two players choose hawkish or dovish actions in a conflict game with incomplete information. An "extremist," who can either be a hawk or a dove, attempts to manipulate decision making. If actions are strategic complements, a hawkish extremist increases the likelihood of conflict, and reduces welfare, by sending a public message which triggers hawkish behavior from both players. If actions are strategic substitutes, a dovish extremist instead sends a public message which causes one player to become more dovish and the other more hawkish. A hawkish (dovish) extremist is unable to manipulate decision making if actions are strategic substitutes (complements).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2897-2922 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | American Economic Review |
Volume | 102 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2012 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics and Econometrics