TY - JOUR
T1 - Timing of copper intrauterine device insertion after medical abortion
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Shimoni, Noa'A
AU - Davis, Anne
AU - Ramos, Maria Elena
AU - Rosario, Linette
AU - Westhoff, Carolyn
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Objective: To compare intrauterine device (IUD) use at 6 months in women randomized to receive an intrauterine copper contraceptive 1 week compared with 1 month after medical abortion. Methods: We recruited women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol and choosing the copper IUD for contraception. We randomly assigned participants to "immediate" insertion 1 week after mifepristone or "delayed" insertion 4-6 weeks later. We followed rates of IUD insertion, 6-month utilization, expulsion, removal, and pregnancy. Participants recorded bleeding in a diary for 4 weeks. Results: We randomized 156 participants. We inserted an IUD in 97% of participants in the immediate group and 76% in the delayed group (P<.001). At 6 months, 69% of participants in the immediate group used the IUD compared with 60% in the delayed group (P=.24). Expulsion rates were comparable; 12% (8 of 69) in the immediate group compared with 11% (7 of 65) in the delayed group. Removals occurred in 14% (10 of 69) of immediate and 8% (5 of 65) of delayed group participants (P=.21). Four pregnancies occurred in delayed group participants who did not return for IUD insertion (P=.09). The immediate and delayed groups reported a median of 20 and 19 bleeding or spotting days, respectively (P=.15). We detected no cases of serious infection, uterine perforation, or hemorrhage. Conclusion: Immediate insertion increased uptake of the IUD without increasing expulsions or bleeding.
AB - Objective: To compare intrauterine device (IUD) use at 6 months in women randomized to receive an intrauterine copper contraceptive 1 week compared with 1 month after medical abortion. Methods: We recruited women undergoing medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol and choosing the copper IUD for contraception. We randomly assigned participants to "immediate" insertion 1 week after mifepristone or "delayed" insertion 4-6 weeks later. We followed rates of IUD insertion, 6-month utilization, expulsion, removal, and pregnancy. Participants recorded bleeding in a diary for 4 weeks. Results: We randomized 156 participants. We inserted an IUD in 97% of participants in the immediate group and 76% in the delayed group (P<.001). At 6 months, 69% of participants in the immediate group used the IUD compared with 60% in the delayed group (P=.24). Expulsion rates were comparable; 12% (8 of 69) in the immediate group compared with 11% (7 of 65) in the delayed group. Removals occurred in 14% (10 of 69) of immediate and 8% (5 of 65) of delayed group participants (P=.21). Four pregnancies occurred in delayed group participants who did not return for IUD insertion (P=.09). The immediate and delayed groups reported a median of 20 and 19 bleeding or spotting days, respectively (P=.15). We detected no cases of serious infection, uterine perforation, or hemorrhage. Conclusion: Immediate insertion increased uptake of the IUD without increasing expulsions or bleeding.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052141380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052141380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ade67
DO - 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ade67
M3 - Article
C2 - 21860292
AN - SCOPUS:80052141380
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 118
SP - 623
EP - 628
JO - Obstetrics and gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 3
ER -