Timing of Trigeminal Nerve Microsurgery

A Review of the Literature

Vincent Ziccardi, Mark J. Steinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Injury to peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve is a known sequelae of oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. The most often studied and reported branches have been the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves. Many questions still remain unanswered concerning the appropriate timing of surgical repair. The literature frequently mentions specific timing guidelines, however, there is scant scientific evidence to support these guidelines. In fact, several authors of clinical series state that although many of their surgical procedures occurred fairly late due to the timing of referral and other issues such as insurance authorization, reasonable clinical results were still achieved in these patients. Various systems of nerve injury evaluation and testing methods make it difficult to draw specific timing recommendations. The consensus of literature reviewed indicates that more research is necessary in this area to better answer these questions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1341-1345
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume65
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2007

Fingerprint

Trigeminal Nerve
Microsurgery
Oral Surgery
Oral Surgical Procedures
Lingual Nerve
Guidelines
Mandibular Nerve
Wounds and Injuries
Insurance
Referral and Consultation
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

@article{09e2e27837d94708913d8c99d5c4d17e,
title = "Timing of Trigeminal Nerve Microsurgery: A Review of the Literature",
abstract = "Injury to peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve is a known sequelae of oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. The most often studied and reported branches have been the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves. Many questions still remain unanswered concerning the appropriate timing of surgical repair. The literature frequently mentions specific timing guidelines, however, there is scant scientific evidence to support these guidelines. In fact, several authors of clinical series state that although many of their surgical procedures occurred fairly late due to the timing of referral and other issues such as insurance authorization, reasonable clinical results were still achieved in these patients. Various systems of nerve injury evaluation and testing methods make it difficult to draw specific timing recommendations. The consensus of literature reviewed indicates that more research is necessary in this area to better answer these questions.",
author = "Vincent Ziccardi and Steinberg, {Mark J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.090",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "1341--1345",
journal = "Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery",
issn = "0278-2391",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "7",

}

Timing of Trigeminal Nerve Microsurgery : A Review of the Literature. / Ziccardi, Vincent; Steinberg, Mark J.

In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 65, No. 7, 01.07.2007, p. 1341-1345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timing of Trigeminal Nerve Microsurgery

T2 - A Review of the Literature

AU - Ziccardi, Vincent

AU - Steinberg, Mark J.

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - Injury to peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve is a known sequelae of oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. The most often studied and reported branches have been the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves. Many questions still remain unanswered concerning the appropriate timing of surgical repair. The literature frequently mentions specific timing guidelines, however, there is scant scientific evidence to support these guidelines. In fact, several authors of clinical series state that although many of their surgical procedures occurred fairly late due to the timing of referral and other issues such as insurance authorization, reasonable clinical results were still achieved in these patients. Various systems of nerve injury evaluation and testing methods make it difficult to draw specific timing recommendations. The consensus of literature reviewed indicates that more research is necessary in this area to better answer these questions.

AB - Injury to peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve is a known sequelae of oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures. The most often studied and reported branches have been the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves. Many questions still remain unanswered concerning the appropriate timing of surgical repair. The literature frequently mentions specific timing guidelines, however, there is scant scientific evidence to support these guidelines. In fact, several authors of clinical series state that although many of their surgical procedures occurred fairly late due to the timing of referral and other issues such as insurance authorization, reasonable clinical results were still achieved in these patients. Various systems of nerve injury evaluation and testing methods make it difficult to draw specific timing recommendations. The consensus of literature reviewed indicates that more research is necessary in this area to better answer these questions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250181666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250181666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.090

DO - 10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.090

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 1341

EP - 1345

JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

SN - 0278-2391

IS - 7

ER -