TY - JOUR
T1 - Transplant recipient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of medication adherence monitoring technology
T2 - A mixed methods study
AU - Lee-Riddle, Grace S.
AU - Schmidt, Harald J.
AU - Reese, Peter P.
AU - Nelson, Maria N.
AU - Neergaard, Rebecca
AU - Barg, Frances K.
AU - Serper, Marina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Medication nonadherence is a leading cause of graft loss. Adherence monitoring technologies—reminder texts, smart bottles, video-observed ingestion, and digestion-activated signaling pills—may support adherence. However, patient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of these tools are not well studied. We conducted qualitative individual semistructured interviews and focus groups among 97 participants at a single center: kidney and liver transplant recipients 2 weeks to 18 months posttransplant, their care partners, and transplant clinicians. We assessed adherence practices, reactions to monitoring technologies, and opportunities for care integration. One-size-fits-all approaches were deemed infeasible. Interviewees considered text messages the most acceptable approach; live video checks were the least acceptable and raised the most concerns for inconvenience and invasiveness. Digestion-activated signaling technology produced both excitement and apprehension. Patients and care partners generally aligned in perceptions of adherence monitoring integration into clinical care. Key themes were importance of routine, ease of use, leveraging technology for actionable medication changes, and aversion to surveillance. Transplant clinicians similarly considered text messages most acceptable and video checks least acceptable. Clinicians reported that early posttransplant use and real-time adherence tracking with patient feedback may facilitate successful implementation. The study provides initial insights that may inform future adherence technology implementation.
AB - Medication nonadherence is a leading cause of graft loss. Adherence monitoring technologies—reminder texts, smart bottles, video-observed ingestion, and digestion-activated signaling pills—may support adherence. However, patient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of these tools are not well studied. We conducted qualitative individual semistructured interviews and focus groups among 97 participants at a single center: kidney and liver transplant recipients 2 weeks to 18 months posttransplant, their care partners, and transplant clinicians. We assessed adherence practices, reactions to monitoring technologies, and opportunities for care integration. One-size-fits-all approaches were deemed infeasible. Interviewees considered text messages the most acceptable approach; live video checks were the least acceptable and raised the most concerns for inconvenience and invasiveness. Digestion-activated signaling technology produced both excitement and apprehension. Patients and care partners generally aligned in perceptions of adherence monitoring integration into clinical care. Key themes were importance of routine, ease of use, leveraging technology for actionable medication changes, and aversion to surveillance. Transplant clinicians similarly considered text messages most acceptable and video checks least acceptable. Clinicians reported that early posttransplant use and real-time adherence tracking with patient feedback may facilitate successful implementation. The study provides initial insights that may inform future adherence technology implementation.
KW - ethics
KW - kidney
KW - liver
KW - qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177858338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177858338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.030
DO - 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 37923085
AN - SCOPUS:85177858338
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 24
SP - 669
EP - 680
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 4
ER -