Treatment outcome in Bulimia

G. Terence Wilson

doi:10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9

Treatment outcome in Bulimia

G. Terence Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper selectively addresses methodological issues in treatment outcome studies of bulimia. Among the issues examined are the following: methodological strengths; problems, such as the comparability of treatments and lack of long-term follow-ups; dependent measures and their interrelationships; how to gauge treatment success and attrition rates. The quality of studies reflects lessons learned in research with other disorders. Increasingly, studies are showing greater methodological rigor.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	161-174
Number of pages	14
Journal	Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy
Volume	11
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9
State	Published - 1989

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Psychiatry and Mental health

Access to Document

10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9

Cite this

@article{b46e374d6d8a433295db4c960d8dee45,

title = "Treatment outcome in Bulimia",

abstract = "This paper selectively addresses methodological issues in treatment outcome studies of bulimia. Among the issues examined are the following: methodological strengths; problems, such as the comparability of treatments and lack of long-term follow-ups; dependent measures and their interrelationships; how to gauge treatment success and attrition rates. The quality of studies reflects lessons learned in research with other disorders. Increasingly, studies are showing greater methodological rigor.",

author = "Wilson, {G. Terence}",

year = "1989",

doi = "10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "11",

pages = "161--174",

journal = "Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy",

issn = "0146-6402",

publisher = "Pergamon Press Ltd.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment outcome in Bulimia

AU - Wilson, G. Terence

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - This paper selectively addresses methodological issues in treatment outcome studies of bulimia. Among the issues examined are the following: methodological strengths; problems, such as the comparability of treatments and lack of long-term follow-ups; dependent measures and their interrelationships; how to gauge treatment success and attrition rates. The quality of studies reflects lessons learned in research with other disorders. Increasingly, studies are showing greater methodological rigor.

AB - This paper selectively addresses methodological issues in treatment outcome studies of bulimia. Among the issues examined are the following: methodological strengths; problems, such as the comparability of treatments and lack of long-term follow-ups; dependent measures and their interrelationships; how to gauge treatment success and attrition rates. The quality of studies reflects lessons learned in research with other disorders. Increasingly, studies are showing greater methodological rigor.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024469339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024469339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9

DO - 10.1016/0146-6402(89)90020-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0024469339

VL - 11

SP - 161

EP - 174

JO - Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy

JF - Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy

SN - 0146-6402

IS - 3

ER -

Treatment outcome in Bulimia

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this