TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in Antipsychotic Medication Use in Young Privately Insured Children
AU - Bushnell, Greta A.
AU - Crystal, Stephen
AU - Olfson, Mark
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health under Award Number T32MH013043, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute IHS-1409-23194, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality R01HS026001 and 1R18HS023258, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01DA047347 and UL1TR003017. This content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Disclosure: Drs. Bushnell, Crystal, and Olfson have reported no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Objective: To estimate trends of annual antipsychotic medication use by privately insured young children (aged 2–7 years) in the United States, and to describe the clinical and treatment characteristics of these children. Method: The study population included young children from a nationwide commercial claims database (2007–2017). We estimated annual antipsychotic use by age and sex, defined as the number of children dispensed an antipsychotic per year divided by the number enrolled. We described clinical diagnoses and mental health service use in those with prescription antipsychotic use in 2009 and 2017. Results: Annual antipsychotic use in young children was 0.27% in 2007, peaked at 0.29% in 2009, and statistically significantly declined to 0.17% by 2017 (linear trend: −0.017% per year, 95% CI: −0.018 to −0.016). Antipsychotic use was higher in boys than in girls. A greater proportion of antipsychotic users received a mental disorder diagnosis in 2017 (89%) than in 2009 (86%, p < .01). The most common clinical diagnoses in antipsychotic users, under a hierarchical classification, were pervasive developmental disorder (2009 = 27%, 2017 = 38%, p < .01), conduct or disruptive behavior disorder (2009 = 15%, 2017 = 21%, p < .01), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (2009 = 24%, 2017 = 18%, p < .01). Among 2017 antipsychotic users, 32% had 4+ psychotherapy claims, 43% had a psychiatrist visit, and the majority used another psychotropic medication, most commonly a stimulant (boys = 57%, girls = 50%). Conclusion: In privately insured young children, antipsychotic use declined from 2009 to 2017, with shifts toward indications with some supporting evidence. Nevertheless, a majority of use remains off label and for conditions lacking effectiveness and safety data. Improving antipsychotic prescribing in young children remains a challenge.
AB - Objective: To estimate trends of annual antipsychotic medication use by privately insured young children (aged 2–7 years) in the United States, and to describe the clinical and treatment characteristics of these children. Method: The study population included young children from a nationwide commercial claims database (2007–2017). We estimated annual antipsychotic use by age and sex, defined as the number of children dispensed an antipsychotic per year divided by the number enrolled. We described clinical diagnoses and mental health service use in those with prescription antipsychotic use in 2009 and 2017. Results: Annual antipsychotic use in young children was 0.27% in 2007, peaked at 0.29% in 2009, and statistically significantly declined to 0.17% by 2017 (linear trend: −0.017% per year, 95% CI: −0.018 to −0.016). Antipsychotic use was higher in boys than in girls. A greater proportion of antipsychotic users received a mental disorder diagnosis in 2017 (89%) than in 2009 (86%, p < .01). The most common clinical diagnoses in antipsychotic users, under a hierarchical classification, were pervasive developmental disorder (2009 = 27%, 2017 = 38%, p < .01), conduct or disruptive behavior disorder (2009 = 15%, 2017 = 21%, p < .01), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (2009 = 24%, 2017 = 18%, p < .01). Among 2017 antipsychotic users, 32% had 4+ psychotherapy claims, 43% had a psychiatrist visit, and the majority used another psychotropic medication, most commonly a stimulant (boys = 57%, girls = 50%). Conclusion: In privately insured young children, antipsychotic use declined from 2009 to 2017, with shifts toward indications with some supporting evidence. Nevertheless, a majority of use remains off label and for conditions lacking effectiveness and safety data. Improving antipsychotic prescribing in young children remains a challenge.
KW - antipsychotic agents
KW - child
KW - drug utilization
KW - off-label use
KW - trends
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102735620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102735620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.09.023
DO - 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.09.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 33091567
AN - SCOPUS:85102735620
SN - 0890-8567
VL - 60
SP - 877
EP - 886
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -