Two types of endometrial papillary neoplasm a morphometric study

Fourteen cases of Papillary Endometrial Carcinoma (EC) were analyzed by Interactive Computerized Morphometry. Seven cases were diagnosed as well differentiated adenocarcinomas with papillary features (PF) and belonged to a group of EC with associated adenomatous hyperplasia (AH). Seven cases were diagnosed as uterine papillary serous carcinomas (PA) and belonged to a group of EC without associated AH. Two morphometric procedures were used. DRAW for the characterization of individual nuclei (area, perimeter, chord) and NU-MEAS for tissue architectural features (crowding and stratification). Using a stepwise discriminant multifactorial analysis, both methods proved to be accurate for the two diagnostic categories, as shown by the 100 % posterior probabilities and by the two diagnostic categories, as shown by the 100 % posterior probabilities and by the distances between group means. A doubtful case was analyzed and classified using a K-nearest neighbor procedure, compared to the individual cases in the database. The distinction between the two types of papillary EC is important for the differential diagnosis of the two lesions. Well differentiated adenocarcinoma with papillary features is seen usually in the context of a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, in a group of patients known to have estrogen-related less aggressive tumors. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma was described to have a biological behavior similar to that of papillary ovarian carcinoma^7,10 and is encountered in a group of patients with more invasive and less differentiated EC². Computerized interactive morphometry is a valuable method to use for the accuracy of this differential diagnosis in doubtful cases.