Abstract
In a recent paper, Malament (2004) employs a time reversal transformation that differs from the standard one, without explicitly arguing for it. This is a new and important understanding of time reversal that deserves arguing for in its own right. I argue that it improves upon the standard one. Recent discussion has focused on whether velocities should undergo a time reversal operation. I address a prior question: What is the proper notion of time reversal? This is important, for it will affect our conclusion as to whether our best theories are time-reversal symmetric, and hence whether our space-time is temporally oriented.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 201-223 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Philosophy of Science |
Volume | 75 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science