Urban code or urban legend: Endorsement of the street code among delinquent youth in urban, suburban, and rural Georgia

Shelley Keith, Elizabeth Griffiths

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Elijah Anderson’s subcultural explanation for the adoption of the ‘‘code of the street’’ has directed scholarly attention toward specific cultural norms and scripts that encourage or sanction violence in disadvantaged urban neighborhoods. We provide an explicit test of the general assumption that the code of the street is predominantly endorsed by youth residing in urban communities. Using data on 2,183 juvenile offenders committed to the State of Georgia’s Department of Juvenile Justice between July 2002 and December 2003, we examine youths’ strength of endorsement of code-specific attitudes. Importantly, these delinquent youth formerly resided in Georgia zip codes of varying degrees of urbanism, from highly urbanized to isolated rural areas. The findings suggest a considerable generalizability in strength of endorsement of the street code among delinquent youth residing in very distinctive types of territorial units. These analyses illustrate that the contemporary preoccupation among criminologists with an urban-based theory of the code may be misguided; the street code has broader reach than the inner city and is, in general, neither race-specific nor more strongly endorsed among delinquent youth in highly urbanized areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)270-298
Number of pages29
JournalRace and Justice
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Keywords

  • Code of the streets
  • Criminological theories
  • Rural
  • Urban
  • Violence
  • Youth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Urban code or urban legend: Endorsement of the street code among delinquent youth in urban, suburban, and rural Georgia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this