Using early standardized language measures to predict later language and early reading outcomes in children at high risk for language-learning impairments

Judy F. Flax, Teresa Realpe-Bonilla, Cynthia Roesler, Naseem Choudhury, April Benasich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine the profiles of children with a family history (FH+) of language-learning impairments (LLI) and a control group of children with no reported family history of LLI (FHĝ€") and identify which language constructs (receptive or expressive) and which ages (2 or 3 years) are related to expressive and receptive language abilities, phonological awareness, and reading abilities at ages 5 and 7 years. Participants included 99 children (40 FH+ and 59 FHĝ€") who received a standardized neuropsychological battery at 2, 3, 5, and 7 years of age. As a group, the FH+ children had significantly lower scores on all language measures at 2 and 3 years, on selected language and phonological awareness measures at 5 years, and on phonological awareness and nonword reading at 7 years. Language comprehension at 3 years was the best predictor of later language and early reading for both groups. These results support past work suggesting that children with a positive family history of LLI are at greater risk for future language and reading problems through their preschool and early school-age years. Furthermore, language comprehension in the early years is a strong predictor of future language-learning status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-75
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of learning disabilities
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • General Health Professions

Keywords

  • At risk
  • Early identification
  • Oral and written language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Using early standardized language measures to predict later language and early reading outcomes in children at high risk for language-learning impairments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this