TY - JOUR
T1 - Variability in habitat use by young-of-the-year winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, in three northeastern U.S. estuaries
AU - Goldberg, Ronald
AU - Phelan, Beth
AU - Pereira, Jose
AU - Hagan, Stacy
AU - Clark, Paul
AU - Bejda, Allen
AU - Calabrese, Anthony
AU - Studholme, Anne
AU - Able, Kenneth W.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Alan Stoner, Frederick Thurberg, and Sam Wainright for reading the manuscript and providing insightful comments and suggestions. Richard Trout and Elaine Caldaro-ne advised us on the statistical model. Jeffrey Shapiro, Matt Mro-czka, and Paul Dinwoodie of Cedar Island Marina in Clinton, Connecticut, generously provided dock space and invaluable assistance during the study. Ryan Brunelle, Erik Bedan, John Man-derson, Steve Fromm, David Packer, Jon Finn, Roger Hoden, and Ralph Bush assisted in field work. Chris Zetlin created Fig. 1, Linda Arlen performed sediment analysis, and Andrew Drax-ler and Norbert Psuty provided additional sediment data. This project was funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Coastal Ocean Program, National Marine Fisheries Service, and Rutgers University Marine Field Station. This paper is Rutgers University, Institute of Marine and Coastal Studies Contribution No. 2001-16.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - We compared distribution and abundance by habitat for age-0, young-of-the-year (YOY) winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, in three estuaries (Hammonasset River, Navesink River, and Great Bay-Little Egg Harbor) in the northeastern United States to better define essential fish habitat (EFH). Two replicates of five representative habitats were sampled in most estuaries: eelgrass (Zostera marina), unvegetated areas adjacent to eelgrass, macroalgae, (primarily Ulva lactuca), unvegetated areas adjacent to macroalgae, and tidal marsh creeks. Fish were sampled every two weeks, May through October 1995 and 1996, with a beam-trawl (1-m width, 3-mm mesh net). Abundance of YOY winter flounder was highest in the Navesink River estuary and similar between years, but was significantly lower and differed between years in the Great Bay-Little Egg Harbor and Hammonasset River estuaries. Annual temperature differences appear to influence estuary use by YOY. In the years and estuaries studied, where habitat-related differences in abundance were significant, YOY were found in higher densities in unvegetated areas adjacent to eelgrass. The exception was in the Hammonasset River in 1995 when densities were higher in eelgrass. We conclude that the type of habitat most important to YOY winter flounder varies among estuaries and as a result, care should be taken in defining EFH, based only on limited spatial and temporal sampling.
AB - We compared distribution and abundance by habitat for age-0, young-of-the-year (YOY) winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, in three estuaries (Hammonasset River, Navesink River, and Great Bay-Little Egg Harbor) in the northeastern United States to better define essential fish habitat (EFH). Two replicates of five representative habitats were sampled in most estuaries: eelgrass (Zostera marina), unvegetated areas adjacent to eelgrass, macroalgae, (primarily Ulva lactuca), unvegetated areas adjacent to macroalgae, and tidal marsh creeks. Fish were sampled every two weeks, May through October 1995 and 1996, with a beam-trawl (1-m width, 3-mm mesh net). Abundance of YOY winter flounder was highest in the Navesink River estuary and similar between years, but was significantly lower and differed between years in the Great Bay-Little Egg Harbor and Hammonasset River estuaries. Annual temperature differences appear to influence estuary use by YOY. In the years and estuaries studied, where habitat-related differences in abundance were significant, YOY were found in higher densities in unvegetated areas adjacent to eelgrass. The exception was in the Hammonasset River in 1995 when densities were higher in eelgrass. We conclude that the type of habitat most important to YOY winter flounder varies among estuaries and as a result, care should be taken in defining EFH, based only on limited spatial and temporal sampling.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036113573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036113573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/bf02691309
DO - 10.1007/bf02691309
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036113573
SN - 1559-2723
VL - 25
SP - 215
EP - 226
JO - Estuaries and Coasts
JF - Estuaries and Coasts
IS - 2
ER -