TY - JOUR
T1 - Voicing an impact
T2 - Who does the National Institutes of Health support for voice disorder research?
AU - Schwartz, Scott J.
AU - Svider, Peter F.
AU - Shah, Priyanka
AU - Zuliani, Giancarlo
AU - Eloy, Jean Anderson
AU - Setzen, Michael
AU - Folbe, Adam J.
N1 - Funding Information:
One way to encourage organization of these structured research opportunities may be to recruit and ultimately retain PhD researchers in otolaryngology departments. Over half of all NIH funded projects in voice disorders (58%) were granted to PhDs ( Fig. 1 ). By having PhD researchers in otolaryngology departments, residency trainees interested in voice disorders and laryngology fellows may have additional opportunities to produce meaningful and impactful research. Fundamentally, this can be achieved by receiving significant support from external funding organizations, most notably the NIH. Furthermore, this may also encourage the advancement of clinical research in the field of voice disorders due to the enhanced scholarly atmosphere. Our analysis notes a minority (6.6%) of funded projects in otolaryngology departments are headed by fellowship-trained laryngologists ( Table 1 ). It is only logical that if residency trainees are exposed to voice disorder research early in their training, there will be more interest and academic scholarship in the field later in their careers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Purpose Interest in a variety of neoplastic, functional, neurological, and age-related laryngeal disorders has contributed to the development of laryngology as an established subspecialty. Funding support plays a critical role in facilitating scholarship within the field. Our objectives were to evaluate who is receiving funding from the NIH for topics relevant to voice disorders, and further describe temporal trends in grants awarded. Methods The NIH RePORTER database was searched for grants relevant to voice disorders. Data were further organized by PI specialty, academic department, and funding totals. Furthermore, PI scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index, was calculated. Results A total of 830 funded fiscal years (for 232 unique projects) totaling $203 million have supported projects examining voice disorders. A plurality of projects (32.8%) was awarded to PIs in otolaryngology departments, followed by 17.2% to speech pathology/communication sciences departments. Although year-to-year variation was noted, otolaryngology departments received approximately 15% of funding annually. Funded otolaryngologists had similar scholarly impact values to individuals in other specialties. Conclusions The study of voice disorders involves an interdisciplinary approach, as PIs in numerous specialties receive NIH funding support. As they receive a considerable proportion of this funding and had similar h-indices compared to other specialties involved, otolaryngologists have just as much scholarly impact despite being a smaller specialty. As speech and language pathologists also comprised a significant proportion of individuals in this analysis, enhanced cooperation and encouragement of interdisciplinary scholarly initiatives may be beneficial.
AB - Purpose Interest in a variety of neoplastic, functional, neurological, and age-related laryngeal disorders has contributed to the development of laryngology as an established subspecialty. Funding support plays a critical role in facilitating scholarship within the field. Our objectives were to evaluate who is receiving funding from the NIH for topics relevant to voice disorders, and further describe temporal trends in grants awarded. Methods The NIH RePORTER database was searched for grants relevant to voice disorders. Data were further organized by PI specialty, academic department, and funding totals. Furthermore, PI scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index, was calculated. Results A total of 830 funded fiscal years (for 232 unique projects) totaling $203 million have supported projects examining voice disorders. A plurality of projects (32.8%) was awarded to PIs in otolaryngology departments, followed by 17.2% to speech pathology/communication sciences departments. Although year-to-year variation was noted, otolaryngology departments received approximately 15% of funding annually. Funded otolaryngologists had similar scholarly impact values to individuals in other specialties. Conclusions The study of voice disorders involves an interdisciplinary approach, as PIs in numerous specialties receive NIH funding support. As they receive a considerable proportion of this funding and had similar h-indices compared to other specialties involved, otolaryngologists have just as much scholarly impact despite being a smaller specialty. As speech and language pathologists also comprised a significant proportion of individuals in this analysis, enhanced cooperation and encouragement of interdisciplinary scholarly initiatives may be beneficial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923036181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923036181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.10.026
DO - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.10.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 25459319
AN - SCOPUS:84923036181
VL - 36
SP - 178
EP - 183
JO - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
JF - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
SN - 0196-0709
IS - 2
ER -