Wanting it both ways

Do women approve of benevolent sexism?

Stephen E. Kilianski, Laurie Rudman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An oft-expressed criticism of feminism is that women "want it both ways," opposing what Glick and Fiske (1996) have called "hostile sexism," but accepting or approving of "benevolent sexism." To examine this issue, an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of one hundred female undergraduate volunteers rated profiles of a hostile sexist, a benevolent sexist and a non-sexist. For the benevolent sexist, ratings were mildly favorable, while for the hostile sexist, ratings were highly unfavorable. Forty-four participants (a category referred to as equivocal egalitarians) approved of the benevolent sexist while disapproving of the hostile sexist. Equivocal egalitarianism was positively related to participants' Attitudes About Reality (Unger, Draper, & Pendergrass, 1986) and negatively related to their belief that hostile and benevolent sexism could coexist. Overall, participants considered it unlikely that the hostile and benevolent sexist profiles described the same person. Given previous findings, these data suggest that women may underestimate the coexistence of hostile and benevolent sexism in men (Glick & Fiske, 1996).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-352
Number of pages20
JournalSex Roles
Volume39
Issue number5-6
StatePublished - Sep 1 1998

Fingerprint

Sexism
sexism
rating
Feminism
egalitarianism
coexistence
feminism
Volunteers
criticism
human being
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Kilianski, Stephen E. ; Rudman, Laurie. / Wanting it both ways : Do women approve of benevolent sexism?. In: Sex Roles. 1998 ; Vol. 39, No. 5-6. pp. 333-352.
@article{9bd9957c6a064ac58ab3b674ab8e23cd,
title = "Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism?",
abstract = "An oft-expressed criticism of feminism is that women {"}want it both ways,{"} opposing what Glick and Fiske (1996) have called {"}hostile sexism,{"} but accepting or approving of {"}benevolent sexism.{"} To examine this issue, an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of one hundred female undergraduate volunteers rated profiles of a hostile sexist, a benevolent sexist and a non-sexist. For the benevolent sexist, ratings were mildly favorable, while for the hostile sexist, ratings were highly unfavorable. Forty-four participants (a category referred to as equivocal egalitarians) approved of the benevolent sexist while disapproving of the hostile sexist. Equivocal egalitarianism was positively related to participants' Attitudes About Reality (Unger, Draper, & Pendergrass, 1986) and negatively related to their belief that hostile and benevolent sexism could coexist. Overall, participants considered it unlikely that the hostile and benevolent sexist profiles described the same person. Given previous findings, these data suggest that women may underestimate the coexistence of hostile and benevolent sexism in men (Glick & Fiske, 1996).",
author = "Kilianski, {Stephen E.} and Laurie Rudman",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "333--352",
journal = "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research",
issn = "0360-0025",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5-6",

}

Kilianski, SE & Rudman, L 1998, 'Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism?', Sex Roles, vol. 39, no. 5-6, pp. 333-352.

Wanting it both ways : Do women approve of benevolent sexism? / Kilianski, Stephen E.; Rudman, Laurie.

In: Sex Roles, Vol. 39, No. 5-6, 01.09.1998, p. 333-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wanting it both ways

T2 - Do women approve of benevolent sexism?

AU - Kilianski, Stephen E.

AU - Rudman, Laurie

PY - 1998/9/1

Y1 - 1998/9/1

N2 - An oft-expressed criticism of feminism is that women "want it both ways," opposing what Glick and Fiske (1996) have called "hostile sexism," but accepting or approving of "benevolent sexism." To examine this issue, an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of one hundred female undergraduate volunteers rated profiles of a hostile sexist, a benevolent sexist and a non-sexist. For the benevolent sexist, ratings were mildly favorable, while for the hostile sexist, ratings were highly unfavorable. Forty-four participants (a category referred to as equivocal egalitarians) approved of the benevolent sexist while disapproving of the hostile sexist. Equivocal egalitarianism was positively related to participants' Attitudes About Reality (Unger, Draper, & Pendergrass, 1986) and negatively related to their belief that hostile and benevolent sexism could coexist. Overall, participants considered it unlikely that the hostile and benevolent sexist profiles described the same person. Given previous findings, these data suggest that women may underestimate the coexistence of hostile and benevolent sexism in men (Glick & Fiske, 1996).

AB - An oft-expressed criticism of feminism is that women "want it both ways," opposing what Glick and Fiske (1996) have called "hostile sexism," but accepting or approving of "benevolent sexism." To examine this issue, an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of one hundred female undergraduate volunteers rated profiles of a hostile sexist, a benevolent sexist and a non-sexist. For the benevolent sexist, ratings were mildly favorable, while for the hostile sexist, ratings were highly unfavorable. Forty-four participants (a category referred to as equivocal egalitarians) approved of the benevolent sexist while disapproving of the hostile sexist. Equivocal egalitarianism was positively related to participants' Attitudes About Reality (Unger, Draper, & Pendergrass, 1986) and negatively related to their belief that hostile and benevolent sexism could coexist. Overall, participants considered it unlikely that the hostile and benevolent sexist profiles described the same person. Given previous findings, these data suggest that women may underestimate the coexistence of hostile and benevolent sexism in men (Glick & Fiske, 1996).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032342786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032342786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 333

EP - 352

JO - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

JF - Sex Roles: A Journal of Research

SN - 0360-0025

IS - 5-6

ER -