What Patients Remember: A Content Analysis of Critical Incidents in Health Care

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study reports on a survey of 3,868 patients at six health care institutions. I addressed the following questions: How do patients conceptualize, represent, and evaluate health care encounters? What themes from health care encounters are salient to patients? What role do communication factors play in patients’ conceptualizations, representations, and assessments of health care encounters? Former patients were surveyed and asked to recall and describe their most memorable experience. Presented is the result of a content analysis of 1,125 critical incident descriptions. Responses were classified into six categories based on whether they were related to: (a) clinical/technical facets of the treatment, (b) institutional policies and procedures, (c) facilities and accommodations, (d) personal treatment/caregiver interpersonal communication, (e) quality/quantity of information provided, or (f) other. Across the six institutions, personal treatment/caregiver interpersonal communication was the primary theme of recounted critical incidents, accounting for 46.7% of all responses. In five of the six populations studied, the clinical/technical category ranked second, accounting overall for 27.0% of reported experiences. Facilities and accommodations accounted for 7.3% of the experiences reported, institutional policies and procedures for 9.4%, and quality/quantity of information for 5.8%. Implications are discussed in terms the centrality of interpersonal communication and relationships, and in terms of assessments of health care quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-112
Number of pages14
JournalHealth Communication
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993

Fingerprint

Health care
content analysis
incident
interpersonal communication
health care
Delivery of Health Care
Communication
Organizational Policy
accommodation
Caregivers
caregiver
Health Care Quality Assurance
experience
Therapeutics
communication
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication

Cite this

@article{45b8d5f13f3f4dd1b52b6fb55ca083b7,
title = "What Patients Remember: A Content Analysis of Critical Incidents in Health Care",
abstract = "This study reports on a survey of 3,868 patients at six health care institutions. I addressed the following questions: How do patients conceptualize, represent, and evaluate health care encounters? What themes from health care encounters are salient to patients? What role do communication factors play in patients’ conceptualizations, representations, and assessments of health care encounters? Former patients were surveyed and asked to recall and describe their most memorable experience. Presented is the result of a content analysis of 1,125 critical incident descriptions. Responses were classified into six categories based on whether they were related to: (a) clinical/technical facets of the treatment, (b) institutional policies and procedures, (c) facilities and accommodations, (d) personal treatment/caregiver interpersonal communication, (e) quality/quantity of information provided, or (f) other. Across the six institutions, personal treatment/caregiver interpersonal communication was the primary theme of recounted critical incidents, accounting for 46.7{\%} of all responses. In five of the six populations studied, the clinical/technical category ranked second, accounting overall for 27.0{\%} of reported experiences. Facilities and accommodations accounted for 7.3{\%} of the experiences reported, institutional policies and procedures for 9.4{\%}, and quality/quantity of information for 5.8{\%}. Implications are discussed in terms the centrality of interpersonal communication and relationships, and in terms of assessments of health care quality.",
author = "Brent Ruben",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s15327027hc0502_3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "99--112",
journal = "Health Communication",
issn = "1041-0236",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

What Patients Remember : A Content Analysis of Critical Incidents in Health Care. / Ruben, Brent.

In: Health Communication, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.01.1993, p. 99-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Patients Remember

T2 - A Content Analysis of Critical Incidents in Health Care

AU - Ruben, Brent

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - This study reports on a survey of 3,868 patients at six health care institutions. I addressed the following questions: How do patients conceptualize, represent, and evaluate health care encounters? What themes from health care encounters are salient to patients? What role do communication factors play in patients’ conceptualizations, representations, and assessments of health care encounters? Former patients were surveyed and asked to recall and describe their most memorable experience. Presented is the result of a content analysis of 1,125 critical incident descriptions. Responses were classified into six categories based on whether they were related to: (a) clinical/technical facets of the treatment, (b) institutional policies and procedures, (c) facilities and accommodations, (d) personal treatment/caregiver interpersonal communication, (e) quality/quantity of information provided, or (f) other. Across the six institutions, personal treatment/caregiver interpersonal communication was the primary theme of recounted critical incidents, accounting for 46.7% of all responses. In five of the six populations studied, the clinical/technical category ranked second, accounting overall for 27.0% of reported experiences. Facilities and accommodations accounted for 7.3% of the experiences reported, institutional policies and procedures for 9.4%, and quality/quantity of information for 5.8%. Implications are discussed in terms the centrality of interpersonal communication and relationships, and in terms of assessments of health care quality.

AB - This study reports on a survey of 3,868 patients at six health care institutions. I addressed the following questions: How do patients conceptualize, represent, and evaluate health care encounters? What themes from health care encounters are salient to patients? What role do communication factors play in patients’ conceptualizations, representations, and assessments of health care encounters? Former patients were surveyed and asked to recall and describe their most memorable experience. Presented is the result of a content analysis of 1,125 critical incident descriptions. Responses were classified into six categories based on whether they were related to: (a) clinical/technical facets of the treatment, (b) institutional policies and procedures, (c) facilities and accommodations, (d) personal treatment/caregiver interpersonal communication, (e) quality/quantity of information provided, or (f) other. Across the six institutions, personal treatment/caregiver interpersonal communication was the primary theme of recounted critical incidents, accounting for 46.7% of all responses. In five of the six populations studied, the clinical/technical category ranked second, accounting overall for 27.0% of reported experiences. Facilities and accommodations accounted for 7.3% of the experiences reported, institutional policies and procedures for 9.4%, and quality/quantity of information for 5.8%. Implications are discussed in terms the centrality of interpersonal communication and relationships, and in terms of assessments of health care quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963165257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963165257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327027hc0502_3

DO - 10.1207/s15327027hc0502_3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84963165257

VL - 5

SP - 99

EP - 112

JO - Health Communication

JF - Health Communication

SN - 1041-0236

IS - 2

ER -