What types of performance level labels and descriptors are better suited for equity measurement tools? Contrasting recommendations

Anica Bowe, Elizabeth Drame, Lynnette Mawhinney, Dominique Duval-Diop, Carla Melaco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Equity Audit was designed to measure diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within workplaces. The tool has three versions and is currently undergoing the standard setting process to gather validity evidence for its use within schools and organizations. This study reports on the recommendations from two panels of experts (one for the school version, the other for the Nonprofits/For-profit versions) regarding language use for performance level descriptors and labels. Our findings show that the panels were similar in their recommendations for performance level labels but differed in recommendations for the language of descriptors given workspace type. We discuss these findings in relation to the ethical and critical lens evaluators may adopt in considering the development of tools for DEI work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-398
Number of pages12
JournalEducational Research and Evaluation
Volume29
Issue number7-8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What types of performance level labels and descriptors are better suited for equity measurement tools? Contrasting recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this