When tokens matter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations


Tokens, or low levels of minority or female representatives in state legislatures, have been studied with respect to their perceptions of self-efficacy and political attitudes but not with respect to their actual influence on the passage of public policy. This paper uses state-level data from the child support program between the years 1976-84 to measure the influence of women tokens on the policy process. Using ordered probit models, I explore policy adoption under three configurations: (1) a test of the independent impact of tokens, (2) a dynamic test of the differential impact of tokens and nontokens to analyze potential backlash effects and the potential diffusion of policy preferences, and (3) an interactive test on the potential for tokens to form coalitions. My analysis strongly suggests that tokens make a policy difference independently and to a greater extent than when they are on the cusp of becoming nontokens, but I found less support for the idea that tokens successfully form coalitions to achieve specific policy goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-136
Number of pages28
JournalLegislative Studies Quarterly
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2004

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'When tokens matter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this