Whose view matters? Using participatory processes to evaluate Reflect in Nigeria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

On the basis of a documentation and evaluation process of Reflect in Nigeria, this article raises some issues relating to participatory evaluation. It explores the tensions between the desire to be participatory and the reality of an evaluation process serving multiple and at times conflicting objectives. Placing emphasis on understanding power relations and participation in relation to social justice, the article suggests that in order for participatory evaluation to be a useful concept for diverse stakeholders, it is important to be honest about its limitations and recognize the benefit of balancing participatory techniques with other methodologies, grounded in clear values, aims and vision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)382-394
Number of pages13
JournalCommunity Development Journal
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whose view matters? Using participatory processes to evaluate Reflect in Nigeria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this