Why a “large and unjustified” payment threshold is not consistent with Actavis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

@article{017bc4f528b64a4787d56e5c98d73e9e,

title = "Why a “large and unjustified” payment threshold is not consistent with Actavis",

author = "Carrier, {Michael A.}",

year = "2016",

month = mar,

language = "English (US)",

volume = "91",

pages = "109--118",

journal = "Washington Law Review",

issn = "0043-0617",

publisher = "University of Washington School of Law",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why a “large and unjustified” payment threshold is not consistent with Actavis

AU - Carrier, Michael A.

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964735325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964735325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964735325

SN - 0043-0617

VL - 91

SP - 109

EP - 118

JO - Washington Law Review

JF - Washington Law Review

IS - 1

ER -