TY - JOUR
T1 - Why academics attend conferences? An extended career self-management framework
AU - Sanders, Karin
AU - Kraimer, Maria L.
AU - Greco, Lindsey
AU - Morgeson, Frederick P.
AU - Budhwar, Pawan S.
AU - Sun, Jian Min (James)
AU - Shipton, Helen
AU - Sang, Xiaoli
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Academics, like many other professionals, such as accountants, lawyers, and medical doctors, are primarily responsible for their own ongoing professional development. One of the ways academics are expected to pursue their professional development is by attending conferences structured around their professional associations. However, professional development is a broad construct and we lack a framework for understanding the numerous, specific motivations and goals related to why professionals choose to attend these conferences. To address this issue, we extend King's (2004) career self-management framework in three ways: a) we apply and extend the positioning behaviors of King's model for the situation of academics, b) extend the antecedents of these positioning behaviors from a single to a multi-level framework (including individual, university, and national level antecedents), and c) discuss cross-level effects of these antecedents. Implications and guidance for HR practitioners and future research are also discussed.
AB - Academics, like many other professionals, such as accountants, lawyers, and medical doctors, are primarily responsible for their own ongoing professional development. One of the ways academics are expected to pursue their professional development is by attending conferences structured around their professional associations. However, professional development is a broad construct and we lack a framework for understanding the numerous, specific motivations and goals related to why professionals choose to attend these conferences. To address this issue, we extend King's (2004) career self-management framework in three ways: a) we apply and extend the positioning behaviors of King's model for the situation of academics, b) extend the antecedents of these positioning behaviors from a single to a multi-level framework (including individual, university, and national level antecedents), and c) discuss cross-level effects of these antecedents. Implications and guidance for HR practitioners and future research are also discussed.
KW - Academics
KW - Antecedents
KW - Career self-management
KW - Conferences
KW - Human capital developmental goals
KW - Professionals
KW - Social capital developmental goals
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097056557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097056557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100793
DO - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100793
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85097056557
SN - 1053-4822
JO - Human Resource Management Review
JF - Human Resource Management Review
M1 - 100793
ER -