Why and how mathematicians read proofs: An exploratory study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

83 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, we report a study in which nine research mathematicians were interviewed with regard to the goals guiding their reading of published proofs and the type of reasoning they use to reach these goals. Using the data from this study as well as data from a separate study (Weber, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 39:431-459, 2008) and the philosophical literature on mathematical proof, we identify three general strategies that mathematicians employ when reading proofs: appealing to the authority of other mathematicians who read the proof, line-by-line reading, and modular reading. We argue that non-deductive reasoning plays an important role in each of these three strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-344
Number of pages16
JournalEducational Studies in Mathematics
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Mathematics
  • Education

Keywords

  • Advanced mathematical thinking
  • Argumentation
  • Mathematical practice
  • Proof
  • Proof comprehension
  • Proof reading
  • Validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why and how mathematicians read proofs: An exploratory study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this