Why Environmentally Constrained Towns Choose Growth Controls

Karen M. O'Neill, Thomas K. Rudel, Melanie H. Mcdermott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Growth controls and growth management are nearly as common as progrowth boosterism in parts of the United States. Growth machine and associated urban regime theories propose that mobilized, upper-income communities are most likely to pursue growth management. Yet other types of communities now also attempt to manage growth. To explain this anomaly, political economy approaches must be supplemented. We assess the explanatory power of the cultural landscape concept founded, in part, on conditions of the built and natural environment. We studied four towns ranging in income and in proportion of developed land in New Jersey's Highlands, a rural-urban fringe region. In three towns, including a lower-income farming town, policies evolved to interpret features like steep slopes or farms as posing barriers to intensive development. In revealing this interpretive shift, the cultural landscape concept complements political economy theories by explaining why even unlikely towns may choose to manage growth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-130
Number of pages20
JournalCity and Community
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

town
cultural landscape
income
political economy
management
community
farm
low income
anomaly

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urban Studies

Cite this

O'Neill, Karen M. ; Rudel, Thomas K. ; Mcdermott, Melanie H. / Why Environmentally Constrained Towns Choose Growth Controls. In: City and Community. 2011 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 111-130.
@article{ecea7977bfe54a6aa15b7ee9a6911aaa,
title = "Why Environmentally Constrained Towns Choose Growth Controls",
abstract = "Growth controls and growth management are nearly as common as progrowth boosterism in parts of the United States. Growth machine and associated urban regime theories propose that mobilized, upper-income communities are most likely to pursue growth management. Yet other types of communities now also attempt to manage growth. To explain this anomaly, political economy approaches must be supplemented. We assess the explanatory power of the cultural landscape concept founded, in part, on conditions of the built and natural environment. We studied four towns ranging in income and in proportion of developed land in New Jersey's Highlands, a rural-urban fringe region. In three towns, including a lower-income farming town, policies evolved to interpret features like steep slopes or farms as posing barriers to intensive development. In revealing this interpretive shift, the cultural landscape concept complements political economy theories by explaining why even unlikely towns may choose to manage growth.",
author = "O'Neill, {Karen M.} and Rudel, {Thomas K.} and Mcdermott, {Melanie H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01362.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "111--130",
journal = "City and Community",
issn = "1535-6841",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Why Environmentally Constrained Towns Choose Growth Controls. / O'Neill, Karen M.; Rudel, Thomas K.; Mcdermott, Melanie H.

In: City and Community, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.06.2011, p. 111-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Environmentally Constrained Towns Choose Growth Controls

AU - O'Neill, Karen M.

AU - Rudel, Thomas K.

AU - Mcdermott, Melanie H.

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Growth controls and growth management are nearly as common as progrowth boosterism in parts of the United States. Growth machine and associated urban regime theories propose that mobilized, upper-income communities are most likely to pursue growth management. Yet other types of communities now also attempt to manage growth. To explain this anomaly, political economy approaches must be supplemented. We assess the explanatory power of the cultural landscape concept founded, in part, on conditions of the built and natural environment. We studied four towns ranging in income and in proportion of developed land in New Jersey's Highlands, a rural-urban fringe region. In three towns, including a lower-income farming town, policies evolved to interpret features like steep slopes or farms as posing barriers to intensive development. In revealing this interpretive shift, the cultural landscape concept complements political economy theories by explaining why even unlikely towns may choose to manage growth.

AB - Growth controls and growth management are nearly as common as progrowth boosterism in parts of the United States. Growth machine and associated urban regime theories propose that mobilized, upper-income communities are most likely to pursue growth management. Yet other types of communities now also attempt to manage growth. To explain this anomaly, political economy approaches must be supplemented. We assess the explanatory power of the cultural landscape concept founded, in part, on conditions of the built and natural environment. We studied four towns ranging in income and in proportion of developed land in New Jersey's Highlands, a rural-urban fringe region. In three towns, including a lower-income farming town, policies evolved to interpret features like steep slopes or farms as posing barriers to intensive development. In revealing this interpretive shift, the cultural landscape concept complements political economy theories by explaining why even unlikely towns may choose to manage growth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957899008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957899008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01362.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01362.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79957899008

VL - 10

SP - 111

EP - 130

JO - City and Community

JF - City and Community

SN - 1535-6841

IS - 2

ER -