TY - JOUR
T1 - X-ray nanotomography and focused-ion-beam sectioning for quantitative three-dimensional analysis of nanocomposites
AU - Shuck, Christopher E.
AU - Frazee, Mathew
AU - Gillman, Andrew
AU - Beason, Matthew T.
AU - Gunduz, Ibrahim Emre
AU - Matouš, Karel
AU - Winarski, Robert
AU - Mukasyan, Alexander S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© International Union of Crystallography, 2016.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Knowing the relationship between three-dimensional structure and properties is paramount for complete understanding of material behavior. In this work, the internal nanostructure of micrometer-size (10 μm) composite Ni/Al particles was analyzed using two different approaches. The first technique, synchrotron-based X-ray nanotomography, is a nondestructive method that can attain resolutions of tens of nanometers. The second is a destructive technique with sub-nanometer resolution utilizing scanning electron microscopy combined with an ion beam and 'slice and view' analysis, where the sample is repeatedly milled and imaged. The obtained results suggest that both techniques allow for an accurate characterization of the larger-scale structures, while differences exist in the characterization of the smallest features. Using the Monte Carlo method, the effective resolution of the X-ray nanotomography technique was determined to be 48 nm, while focused-ion-beam sectioning with 'slice and view' analysis was 5 nm.The X-ray nanotomography technique was compared with scanning electron microscopy for quantitative three-dimensional analysis of nanocomposite particles.
AB - Knowing the relationship between three-dimensional structure and properties is paramount for complete understanding of material behavior. In this work, the internal nanostructure of micrometer-size (10 μm) composite Ni/Al particles was analyzed using two different approaches. The first technique, synchrotron-based X-ray nanotomography, is a nondestructive method that can attain resolutions of tens of nanometers. The second is a destructive technique with sub-nanometer resolution utilizing scanning electron microscopy combined with an ion beam and 'slice and view' analysis, where the sample is repeatedly milled and imaged. The obtained results suggest that both techniques allow for an accurate characterization of the larger-scale structures, while differences exist in the characterization of the smallest features. Using the Monte Carlo method, the effective resolution of the X-ray nanotomography technique was determined to be 48 nm, while focused-ion-beam sectioning with 'slice and view' analysis was 5 nm.The X-ray nanotomography technique was compared with scanning electron microscopy for quantitative three-dimensional analysis of nanocomposite particles.
KW - X-ray nanotomography
KW - nanocomposite powder
KW - quantitative image analysis
KW - scanning electron microscopy
KW - three-dimensional reconstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976627752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976627752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1107/S1600577516007992
DO - 10.1107/S1600577516007992
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84976627752
SN - 0909-0495
VL - 23
SP - 990
EP - 996
JO - Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
JF - Journal of Synchrotron Radiation
IS - 4
ER -